几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 11:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 -bracing connection bolted vs welded

x-bracing connection bolted vs welded
i am curious what the general preference is in connecting x-bracing (tension only) members to gusset plates. the general question is bolted vs. welded. i tend to think that bolts are generally easier/faster to install than welds, and therefore cheaper. if bolts are used, then can they be snug tight with standard holes, or would erection tolerances dictate that they have to be oversize holes and pretensioned bolts (would i have to go so far as calling for slip-critical with faying surface preparation)?
find a job or post a job opening
in my opinion a welded x-brace should be less work and therefore cost less. a bolted connection requires detailed layouts of holes in both the angle and gusset plate. sometimes during the installation stage gusset plates need to be trimmed in order to fit up in with other
we generally use a single bolt for erection purposes and then weld.
as a rule of thumb, welded for shop connections and bolted for field connections.
i must agree with dbuzz. field welding is expensive and i am always concerned for the quality. this is due to the varying and hard to control factors.
shop weld and field bolt is good advice.
regards,
lutfi
dbuzz and lutfi - are we talking about the same thing? i agree that in general shop weld and field bolt is the way to go, but i'm not talking about something like welding double angle shear connections at each end of each beam to columns. i'm only dealing with x-bracing connections. if you are using bolts for x-bracing connections, do you use oversize holes, and do you specify anything more stringent than snug tight? if i were using the brace as a compression brace, i think (not everyone i talked to agrees on this) it would fall under the heading of "built-up
per asd oversize round holes are for use with slip critical connections. slotted holes normal to load direction are allowed but in my opinion of little practical use because they don't help the fitup problem. while some reaming etc. is permitted during fitup, bigger holes will require bigger bolts.
-mike
i don't think there really is a better way, but just depends on the fabricator/erector preferences.
if you use bolted, keep in mind that braces are often fabricated intentionally short by a small amount. i think 1/16" is common. somebody pointed out a mistake(?) that i made once by showing oversized holes to help with fitup. the supposed mistake was that the oversized holes negated the intention of the short brace fabrication. not sure either way, but it's worth mentioning because some of the others typed about oversized and slotted holes.
dbd
as someone else mentioned, welding the x-bracing works well because when they are off by 1/2" it is no problem at all. we use welded x-bracing and never have problems with it. it is usually an easy weld as well.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wood truss lateral bracing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:19 PM
welded moment connection end plate design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 07:46 PM
welded connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 07:45 PM
permanent truss bracing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:11 PM
bolted moment connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:15 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:34 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多