几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:35 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wl uplift on bar jois

wl uplift on bar joist
i'm involved with a wind load analysis of a building built in 1987 and am trying to determine the uplift capacity of the roof support structure. the building has interior and exterior cmu bearing walls and a lightweight concrete deck on vent forms attached to bar joists of various spans at 4 ft. o.c.
the c&c pressures for the joists are 57 to 77.4 psf for zones 2 and 3 respectively and the dl is 37.5 psf (22.5 for 0.6dl).
my question is: without any reference concerning joist uplift loading on the as-builts, may i consider some percentage of the load capacity given in the bar joist standard load tables for uniformly distributed load as a capacity in uplift? the bridging shown on the plans seems to follow the requirments of the steel joist institute specifications. also, there is a note on the drawings that states: "bottom chords of joists shall match top chords."
any advise would be greatly appreciated.
-jack
the difference is in the lateral bracing of the chords.
for downward gravity conditions, the top chord is laterally braced throughout by the roof deck - lb = 1 ft or so.
for the uplift condition, the bottom chord only has bridging to brace it laterally so the lb is much larger and thus the capacity much smaller. you would have to field measure the bottom chords and do a more precise analysis using current applicable sji specification requirements.
alternatively, you could contact the manufacturer of the joists and see if they can do an analysis for you. one thing you could try is to suggest to them that they determing the maximum unbraced length of the bottom chord (i.e. the new bridging spacing) that would be required for the uplift loads and then add bridging accordingly.
in addition to what jae said, i would suggest that you make sure that you have bottom chord bridging at the both ends of the joist. this may not have been provided in 1987.
thank you both for your helpful replies.
also, prior to reading these, i had just gotten off the phone with vulcraft tech support where it had been suggested that, if i could get a tag off one of the joists, it would have project i.d. and piecework numbers that could possibly be used by the factory to track it back to its design info.
i'll look at all these ideas.
thanks again.
-jack
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wind uplift on prestress huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:24 PM
uplift on foundation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 05:32 PM
stresses in a bent bar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:44 AM
existing bar jois huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:50 AM
国家标准全文数据库系统-机械卷 共计 3143 个标准 taobao American standards 0 2009-04-26 08:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:22 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多