几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:55 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wind load on pipe rack

wind load on pipe rack
i have a long, five- tier structural steel pipe rack supported on braced bents spaced about 30 ft c/c. bent width is about 20 ft. the total height of the structure is about 38 ft. there is a possibility that the owner may decide to place cladding on both sides of the upper 18 ft of the pipe rack in order to hide the piping, etc from view. there will be no roof but, of course, the top level may or may not be loaded up with pipes, cable trays, etc.
question: what is the wind load? do i consider there to be two separate walls, each subject to positive wind pressure? will the windward wall offer any shielding to the leeward wall?
any advice or references would be appreciated.
frank hartzell
jacobs engineering
conshohocken, pa
frank...a couple of comments:
when the rack is loaded, the net wind load will likely not be critical.
when unloaded, with the panels at the top, the lateral net wind load will likely be at its most critical. in general, the windward side of the structure would have a factor of about 1.25 to 1.50 and the leeward side would have a -0.75 to -1.0, therefore both acting in the same direction. if the top of the rack is open, you would need to consider windward and leeward pressure on each of the panel walls, as the wind could "dip" over the top of the leading panel wall and impact the lagging wall, thus exerting pressures on both. this, i believe, answers your shading question.
you might also check the rack with only a few pipes on it, as this could conceivably give you a higher wind pressure from the side, though likely the dead load of the pipes will be adequate to stabilize for overturning.
ron
check your building code for wind load requirements on components and cladding. then, like ron said, you may have to consider pressure on one face and suction on the other acting at the same time.
using asce 7-95 as the guide to most building codes your threshold for components and cladding is a trib area of 750 square feet. a 30 spacing of bents would only need to be 25 feet high to meet this. you can use the main wind force resisting system to determine your total load. when calculating this, you can leave out the internal wind coefficient, gcpi, because you have no internal pressure. also look to see if you could qualify as an open structure since your cladding could concievably be on one side. finally don't forget to check the column for overturning compression, where the worst case would be fully loaded.
hope this helps.
if there is a cladding 18' deep, it certainly will provide a lot of
shielding to a similar cladding 20' on the leeward side. you
should consider a shape coefficient of 1.5 for the windward
cladding. the shielding coefficient for your case should be
available in some codes. (i know indian standard has, others
should have; and some texts should. sorry, i get no time for
search these days!). it would be of the order of 2/3, and your
total force would be about 2 times the basic wind pressure
times the area.
windward = 1.5 * force
leeward = (1 - 2/3) * windward = 0.5 * force
total = 2 * force, where force = pressure * area
the load on the elements not covered by the cladding should be
considered separately!
hth,
m. hariharan
i have found that wind loads and seismic loads can often dominate the design for pipe racks but then my designs are often in cyclone (hurricane) regions and/or seismic regions.
the sheeting on the windward side should shield the pipes and leeward sheeting and will probably be in your wind loading code.
you will have to check different load combinations to see which is the most critical for design, including uplift on footings.
pressure coefficients are likely to be different between your code and mine so i won't quote any.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wind load on a pipe a pipe behind huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:47 PM
wind load calculation for belt conveyor truss design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:41 PM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:17 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多