几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 which r factor to use for a 1996 steel building

which r factor to use for a 1996 steel building
i was asked if a 6000 square foot, one story steel building could take the added weight of solar pv panels on the roof. i have the plans and am trying to decide if the current icc code would be more relaxed for the seismic requirements than originally calculated. can anyone shed light here? i usually work with wood frame construction.
the criteria are seismic design catagory d
sds = 1.00
sd1 = 0.6
roof dead load = 14.6 psf
the building was originally designed with v = 0.183 w
it has a moment frame in the transverse direction and crossed 5/8" rods in the longitudinal direction.
what response modification factor, r,would you use under current code? i'm hoping that the pv panels (4 psf) would not add undue seismic loading to the building.
thanks---peter

first: determine if the local building code has adopted the iebc (international existing building code) by icc. if so, look at those rules.
second: if the iebc is not law, then you should use chapter 34 or 35, i can't re
thanks for that advice. i assume that the seismic loading will be increased by 4/15 psf = 27% under the panels. however, i want to check if the current code could reduce the seismic coeficient in any way and reduce it below the design coeficient of 0.183. i'm trying to figure out which r factor to use for the cross braced 5/8" rods. i guess the moment frame is an ordinary steel moment frame with an r of 3.5 since it has no apparent notches in the beams. would you agree?
peter
the safest assumption for the moment frames is as you say, ordinary moment frames. in the other direction, the r factor is a function of what the vertical bracing system is. if it is rod bracing in the walls, then it would be ocbf (r=3.25). roof rods fall under the overall definition of "horizontal diaphragm".
the spectral acceleration values have been reduced in many areas of the country so you actually receive a lower seismic base shear coefficient under the current code. this may offset the increased structural mass due to the additional panels on the roof.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
welding rebar to steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 08:02 PM
weight of steel structures per area of building huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 07:36 PM
pre-engineered metal building engineer sse or ser huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 02:08 PM
metal building manufacturers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:36 PM
国家标准全文数据库系统-机械卷 共计 3143 个标准 taobao American standards 0 2009-04-26 08:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:56 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多