几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 08:52 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 when would one choose hot rolled purlinsgirts over cold-for

when would one choose hot rolled purlins/girts over cold-for
when would the choice for hot-rolled sections be better than going for cold-formed sections for purlins/girts?
for example, right now, i have 0.4 m deep cold formed channels for purlins spaced every 1.0 m. these purlins are 23.5 kg/m. i'm thinking perhaps i can get better economy if i go for hot rolled purlins. would you agree?
this depends primarily on the material you are supporting, in my opinion.
your hot rolled purlins will almost certainly be more expensive, as the material of the roof cladding will have a maximum spanning ability; typically much more in line with cfs purlins.
as an aside, cfs design is actually much more challenging than regular steel design, but the manuals for sizing purlins, etc, make it easy. when you want to do something unique with a material, then you're analytically best to go with hot rolled unless you must choose cfs.
cheers,
ys
b.eng (carleton)
working in new zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...
cold formed purlins will generally be more economical because of the efficiency of use of the material. i am unfamiliar with the heavy cold formed purlin section you are using, so my blanket statement may not apply. if this is an industrial application, corrosion resistance should be a consideration. another thing to consider is how the cladding is attached--screwing to a thick flange is not common.
z shapes in folded cold formed purlins as well as channels with turned edges are the most economical with folded metal decks. the one meter spacing of the purlins makes me suspect a concrete or other roof system which negates my previous sentence.
nope civilperson, there is no concrete. it's a metal deck cladding, reason being for the 1.0 m spacing is because of a 4kpa snow load on the roof. the building is located in northern canada, where there is lots of snow.
hey clansman;
i'm a canadian trained engineer, and worked my first three years in canada. given the deflection requirements in addition to strenght, i just don't see hot rolled steel giving you any economy.
my original post still stands, even given snow loading.
cheers,
ys
b.eng (carleton)
working in new zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...
try a 75 mm deep deck type for the 4kpa snow load. if 3.0 n deck is used with three continuous spans, then the deck, (18 gage), span limit for l/240 deflection can be 3.0 meters.
another question: why on earth would a cladding manufacturer catalogue state that "strength capacity should be checked against specified loads" and not factored?

i wouldn't know exactly how to interpret that statement. sounds like a nothing sentence to try to protect the manufacture against misuse of the product.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
hot rolled vs fabricated member huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:09 PM
do we ignore inelastic behavior of cold rolled beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:06 PM
cold formed steel design with ramadvanse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:54 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM
[求助]?例四 编程遇到的问题 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 02:17 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:35 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多