几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 08:39 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wheel load distribution on road plate

wheel load distribution on road plate
a collegue of mine asked me about the proper wheel load distribution for h-20 loading on a temporary "road plate" used to cover a trench.
looking through the aashto code, i didn't find anything applicable to spanning with plate steel. did i miss it somewhere?
thanks for all of the tips. i read much more than i post...
check out our whitepaper library.
use the simple span distribution of the wheel load if you are concerned with the reactions at each end of the trench , but conservatively in this situation i would assume the load is 1/2 the axle load, say 16 kips.road plate is not typically designed. the distribution of the wheel load is more for stringer and girder design. there is a distribution for flat slabs that are loaded perpendicular to traffic, but this is more for concrete slab bridges.
there are formulas in aashto. one for point loads and one for uniform loads, that will give you the percentage of load that is carried by each direction.
with a: being the short span
b: being the long span
point load short span is b^3/(a^3+b^3)
point load long span is a^3/(a^3+b^3)
some judgement will be required to establish the effective width of plate that carries the wheel. but with the wheel contact area of 20", i would not hesitate to double that width for the effective width of plate.
i would assume that the plate would fail by bending at a line in the middle, and solve for average moment at that line. treating the wheel load as a point at the center of the plate would be conservative. you could assume pressure approximately equal to tire pressure to spread it out over a larger area (75-100 psi for large trucks).
is that aashto distribution above based on plate supported on two sides or is that for support on four sides?
the distribution formulas are for two way action.
seems like the load carried in the transverse direction would be zero if the the sides of the plate are unsupported. there's no place to carry that load to.
thanks for all of the comments. it's a continuous trench for practical purposes, so the sides are unsupported. i would have thought double the wheel contact area reasonable, but was looking for something to back it up with.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
load distribution to three supports due to concentrated load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:04 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
design load distribution member1 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:26 PM
allowable load on steel road plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:00 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:45 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多