几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 07:50 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 welding across a square hss

welding across a square hss
imagine a skidder, whose frame is 2- 8x8 sq. tubes running parallel as the frame. now outriggers are to be welded behind the rear tires, as a drill rig is now mounted on the back. the mount plates have 3 sides of the 8x8 cut out of them and are mounted from underneath perpendicular to the frame. the plates are to be welded on all three sides of the tube.
my question is shouldn't there be no weld on the bottom side of the tube?? isn't that a no no.
could someone also explain this principle better?
thanks
based on the information that you have provided, if you weld all three sides then i think your weld itself is going to look like an inverted u?
this will create eccentric loading on the weld and also will eccentrically load the tubing.
yes that is what i mean, except the u is not inverted as the plates are welded from underneath, anyways its the same thing.
does anyone know a good example or an explanation in "laymen" terms, or even a rule of thumb that i can use to help the new welders understand, and some of the veterens as well?
when that weld is loaded, you could think of it as un-doing a zipper. it starts at the top and works its way down, instead of the whole weld working equally to distribute and resist the load. once the top fails, the rest is on its way shortly thereafter.
ok thanks that works, but i got the question of well if the top weld fails then the two verticals are still there, and also that it would seem that the more weld the better i explained that it would cause a stress concentration spot after the top cracks as best i could. also would it be wise to say to never weld perpendicular to a load? even if its not welded to a structural
i believe what you are trying to describe is that if you are allowed by code to increase the capacity of the weld when it is loaded perpendicular to the weld axis....which in turn makes the "perpendicular" weld stronger than the two longitudinal welds. intuition would lead one to believe that most of the load is then resisted by the perpendicular weld until it fails. or at least this is what my highschool welding teacher used to say. is it true? i don't know, but someone here will.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
ss v hss huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 04:05 PM
rebar weldability huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:49 PM
no spark welding huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:28 PM
hss section reduction question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:06 PM
corner radius of hss shapes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:03 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:00 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多