几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 03:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 op bar development length in conc wall

top bar development length in conc wall
do you have to apply the reinforcement location factor of 1.3 (aci 318-02) for horizontal bars in a concrete wall which are spaced less than 12 inches on center? i have applied this factor to all the horizontal reinforcing, however two different rebar detailers have stated this factor does not apply to horizontal bars in concrete walls spaced less than 12" o.c. any opinions would be appreciated! i work in se usa.

according to aci 318-02, chapter 12, the α factor on "top bars" does not mention anything about an exclusion for walls. there is nothing else in chapter 14 (walls) either about this. (this factor is referred to as ψt in 318-05)
i would say you have to use the 1.3 factor.
i would apply it, although i can't prove that it's necessary.
the idea is that bars with substantial elevations of concrete below might have water/air accumulated underneath. i don't see why this would happen for a beam, but not for a wall.
while aci 318-02 uses the phrase "member, it's been taken out of 318-05. even still, isn't a wall a "
stuff like this kills me. make the detailer give you the code reference. as engineers, we usually play the nice guy and do the leg work.
let's take a stand!
alright, that's over the top.
if you are asking about splice lengths, then 12.15.1 does not allow a reduction for excess reinforcement, unless you qualify for a class a splice.
earlier references to this provision in aci 318, textbooks, and code committee 408 always included the term "top bars." my college textbook (wang & salmon) says it was based on limited tests with concrete depths of 12 to 18 inches that indicated the splitting resistance was lowered by 10 to 20%. i the old days, we only included this tem for bars at the top of beams and thick slabs.
sometime between 1977 and 1995, the term "top bars" was eliminated from the code. i never saw an explanation for the change. that is, i never read that new research done on walls indicated that the provision should be applied to horizontal wall bars.
"if anyone has read any research that supoorts this provision in wall reinforcing, i would be interested in reading it."
the references are 12.4 and 12.5 in aci 318-02.
12.4 is a research report, so not sure how to get it.
12.5 is in the aci structural journal, 1988. i don't have them going back that far, but surely somebody here does.
horizontal reinforcing with more than 12" of concrete below, (no exceptions listed). could apply to circular ties in columns.
civilperson, you mean ones without hooks, i assume?
i obtained a copy of the research report (reference 12.4) from the author and finally got around to reading it. there are some startling revelations in this report, particularly regarding superplasticized concrete, and vertical reinforcing. and yes, a position factor is meant to apply to all horizontal bars with more than 12 inches of concrete cast below, regardless of bar specing. i highly recommend e-mailing the author and asking for a copy of this report. i may take o couple of months for the author to respond, but it's worth the wait.
this has to do with the amount of concrete below the bar, not the bar spacing. air bubbles form underneath the bar requiring more development length. have you ever known a bubble in a glass of water to always rise perfectly vertical? or could it rise on a 1:12 slope?
tell the detailer that you regard them to follow your notes irregardless of the assumptions they made in their bid.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
development length of reinforcement in shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:30 PM
国家标准全文数据库系统-机械卷 共计 3143 个标准 taobao American standards 0 2009-04-26 08:55 PM
Example - a basic calculation on uncertainty yogy 坐标测量机 0 2007-07-22 05:26 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:15 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多