几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 able 1607.1 sidewalk 8,000 lb point load

table 1607.1 sidewalk 8,000 lb point load
i have a simple 4' wall in the row of a typical 36' street, the curb is 7' from the back of wall. gonna do a keystone wall. i used the rankine method of analysis, not ncma (conservative).
ibc table 1607.1, "sidewalk etc. ..." specifies that a 8,000 lb. point load on 20 sq. inches is required. this loading is required for the city of "la la land"'s retaining wall next to a city street per the design manual.
i pointed out that the city sidewalk couldn't handle that kind of point load let alone the soil 1' from the wall. first i showed them that the standard 4" thick city sidewalk couldn't be shown to support an 8k load over 20 inches square. i then pointed out that the necessary soil bearing strength calcs out to be 58 ksf, and that no soil i know can do this.
i am at a loss here. i have succombed to the city and provided for 1000 psf ll. i don't know the reasoning nor the impetus behind this requirement. do you?
thank you.
e.j.
find a job or post a job opening
trucks drive up onto sidewalks.
i dont know how many times i see semis drive over a side walk to make the tight turn. city worker trucks drive over side walk all the time, almost like cops that think they can park anywhere.
to quote an architect i used to know:
arguing with a building official is like getting into a mud pit wrestling match with a pig. you will get muddy, mad and frustrated unless you realize one thing: the pig likes to wrestle.
a bousinesque (spelling suspect here) analysis will help you deal with the local lateral surcharge pressures due to wheel point loading. it's not hard and i would probably "push" the numbers (unconservatively) for the transient vehicular load.
i would also research whether they also want a guardrail for a 4' drop. guardrail forces will govern the design of most any retaining wall structure.
the pig does not like to wrestle, the pig is used arguing with people wanting the code to be ignored without going through the appeal process. the building official has no authority to deviate from the code.
don phillips
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
moving point load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:22 PM
load testing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:14 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
distributed load vs. point load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:00 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:07 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多