几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:14 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 superior wall - precast basement foundation walls

superior wall - precast basement foundation walls
does anyone have experience with this product? i'm interested in opinions about the structural make-up of the panels. is anyone aware of how they can be justified thru any reasonable aci provisions?
here's a link to the product:
note that the superior wall does not have a footing. it sits on compacted crushed stone. personally i do not like that aspect of the system. it is used a great deal in our area.
thanks bylar. i agree (about the crushed stone) but i am hoping to discuss the design and analysis of the concrete wall panels themselves. the concrete studs are separated from the face panel by the 1/4 inch foam and connected only thru a few 20d nails and (maybe) a #3 bar at the top and bottom. i don't see how that works. also, the haunches they use for brick veneer support are "connected" to the face panel with short pieces of bar(no hooks, no nothing). i don't think there is any way they could be confirming to any aci provisions for dowels or embedment length or corbels etc.
in your area, how do they get the local building authority to accept it? is it in your building code? i have seen some things recently that relate to code acceptance but that seems to be mostly about the crushed stone bearing.
i have seen very little on the concrete design (asside from the manufacturers info and testing which i find dubious).
i just don't see how it can be justified by any aci design provisions and i am wondering if anyone out there has evaluated the product in this way or if anyone has seen how others have justified it. i would think that the maunfacturers might need to satisfy local buildingn authorities with some detailed engineering evaluation by a local engineer as a way to gain acceptance. do local engineers stamp designs in a manner that is similar to wood truss designs? i am not aware of that practice but i really don't know.
it system have it limitations parameters by the icc, please visit the following web page:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
settlement - new 2 story home analysis of wall foundation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 09:19 PM
residential basement foundation wall anchorage huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:10 PM
basement walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:36 PM
basement wall design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:35 PM
anchor bolts spacing basement walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:53 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:27 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多