几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 11:48 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 structural tubing telescopic connection

structural tubing telescopic connection
two pieces of tubular steel sections (round or square or rectangular) are telescopically connected as shown on the attached sketch. how to calculate/determine minimum overlapping length in order to develop full moment capacity of the smaller section?
thank you,
iv

how are the two pieces going to be connected together ?
i'd anticipate bolts; a minimum of two rows would produce a reasonable bending connection.
how tightly do the two pieces fit together ?
obviously, if there is a lot of clearance, the two pieces will act more like a plastic hinge.
if a sliding fit, and no fastener except for something to keep the parts together, then i would likely do a quick fe model, complete with air gap. i'm not aware of any empiracle methods.
dik
just a thought:
1. calculate moment capacity of smaller section = sxfb
2. calculate a couple equal to m/d where d = overlap length
3. calculate shear strees equal to couple/av where couple equals m/d & av equals shear area in vertical legs
4. check shear stress against allowable
5. recalculate overlap length and repeat until shear stress is less than allowable.
this analysis assumes a tight fit between the pieces.

i like steve1's approach. although it may not have much effect, i would increase "d" by a bearing length, the shear divided by (.9fy times an assumed bearing width). question is, what's an appropriate bearing width. for a round tube, i think you can use the smaller tube diameter. for a square or rectangular tube, i'd use 3 times the outside corner radius of the smaller tube.
i recommend you check buckling of the thin wall and i would probably cut the value of 'd' in your model in half of the actual overlap length. look at a free body diagram of one end and it should be clear to you.
using six different hhs sizes (2" to 5.5"),i get a empirical result of: overlap d = twice the larger
awd d1.1 has limits on the fit up tolerances for telescoping peices
aws**
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
structural steel connection design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:41 AM
structural ii huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:25 AM
structural connection design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:02 AM
pe structural i or civil huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:54 AM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:15 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多