几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:29 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 soldier pile wall - with concrete panel lagging

soldier pile wall - with concrete panel lagging
i am designing a soldier pile retaining wall for a roadway with a change in retainment from 5ft to 30ft. we want to use concrete panels for the lagging rather than timber as this will be a permanant structure, but several searches on google turn up nothing useful as far as manufacturers go. does anyone know of companies that do this? we are thinking the panels would be similar to those used for sound barriers on highways, but we need to show details and manufacturures on our drawings.


precast concrete panels are not the way to go unless (1)the wall is a total fill wall, (2) unless you can totally and safely open cut to subgrade so that you can stack and backfill the panels from the bottom up, or (3) unless you use timber lagging as you excavate from the top, proceeding downward, with the plan to attach a precast facing after the wall is built.
precast plank lagging installed from the top down as you excavate is an extremely bad idea - especially if you have a tiedback wall.
before you design any precast lagging wall, talk to the specialty contractors who may build the wall. they will have opinions on the use of precast.
i agree with peinc. one option would be to build a soldier beam and timber lagged wall. then add shear studs and pour a conc. face.
i was involved in a project similar to (2) described by peinc. precast was used. however, it was designed specifically for the project. very difficult, painful project.
i've also done one this height with shotcrete and soldier piles. cheaper than a one sided form and shear studs on the piles.
i agree with the above comments.
install corrosion protected soldier beams.
install timber lagging. pressure treatment usually not needed.
install corrosion protected tieback anchors whenever the lagging reaches a tieback grade.
continue installing lagging and tiebacks until subgrade is reached.
install a premanent facing: either cip concrete, shotcrete, or a mechanically connected precast facing (which is my personal last choice).
don't forget to address wall drainage using some product like miradrain applied against the lagging, between soldier beams.
also, a tiedback wall should not use tieback wales which will interfere with the facing. use some type of thru-beam connection or double wf or double channel sections so that the tiebacks can be installed between the two
oh boy... you've all given me plenty to think about. having never (personally or within the company) done anything remotely close to this design, it seems as though we had already planned to do everything you all say to not do....that being we planned on using precast concrete lagging, double channel whaler on the outside of the wall (which would interefere with the lagging) and assumed the lagging could be loaded from the top and dropped down during excavation.
i was working on a spreadsheet to help with the calculations as we don't have any software to handle this type of work. would some out there mind taking a look at it for me to see if it makes sense.
we planned on using chance spiral anchors as the support, roughly 6 ft from the top. would they be someone to call and chat with about the best way to go about this design/construction?
thanks for all your help...i have a feeling this message board will be coming in quite handy in the future.
burgobertin,
if you are a consultant doing the design for the owner, call a specialty, design-build contractor who is very experienced in tiedback walls. they would like to help just to get the lead on the job. where are you located?
google "peirce engineering, inc."
burgoeng,
check out the geotechnical engineering circular no. 4 put out by federal highway adminstration. i believe it will give you what you are looking for.
peinc,
we are a civil design firm (mostly grading, drainage, traffic, site develop/planning, small 1 story structures). i was recently brought in to help in expanding structural design capacity, but my background is in power so this stuff is all new to me.
we're in northern nj. the job is north bergen, nj, right along the hudson river. i'll try getting in contact with peirce to see if they'll lend some advice. i took a look at their site and they have pic of a njdot job with tie-backs that looks roughly like what we were aiming for initally.
that's me.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
concrete seawalli-wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:35 PM
concrete basement wall design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:39 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:39 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多