几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:11 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 soffit suction pressure

soffit suction pressure
how do i go about calculating the suction pressure on the eaves of a roof to determine the attachment of the soffit material? i know there are tables that spell out the attachment of the soffit based on the wind speed but i would rather calculate the pressure myself and determine the attachment.
suction on the soffit should be the same as the suction on the wall adjacent to the eave.
suction on the soffit should be the same as the overhang pressure.
i don't think soffits see suction--they just see uplift.
daveatkins
dave,
if there is suction at the top of a wall, there has to be suction on the adjacent soffit. similarly with positive pressure on wall, then uplift on soffit. you can't go from positive to negative without transitioning through zero.
that seems logical, but i don't think the code reads that way.
daveatkins
depends on which code you are talking about. i suppose you mean the us asce standard. i am in australia, and our standard is a bit more specific, but this is really not about a code, it is just common sense.
typically, codes require checking both directions.
don't mean any disrespect, i would agree more with dave on this. suction is a result of pressure differential between the interior space and the outdoor. the suffit is likely to experience lifting (wind hitting the wall and changes direction upward) than pressure differential.
agree with hokie66 - suction on the soffit should be the same as that on the wall adjacent to the soffit. experimental evidence bears this out.
asce 7-05 is not clear on the subject; however, for some hard data and conclusions see the paper by vickery entitled "component and cladding wind loads for soffits", asce journal of structural engineering, may 2008.
from conclusions section of the aforementioned paper:
"the results of the experimental program clearly indicated that wall and soffit pressures are highly correlated....the results indicate a simple and accurate solution to the soffit loading deficiency in asce 7 is to prescribe that the component in cladding pressures (both positive and negative) for use in the design of soffits be identical to the component and cladding loads used for the design of the wall components."
thanks, willis. looks like experimentation bears out common sense in this case.
kslee, suction is just the pressure on one side of a surface. you do sum the pressures on both sides of a wall for design, but a soffit will usually only see the external pressure, as the top of the soffit is in the enclosed roof cavity. you do get upward pressure on soffits on the windward side, but on the leeward and side wall, the soffit pressure is usually suction.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
octagon footing base pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:53 PM
hydrodynamic suction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:18 PM
at rest vs active earth pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:48 PM
added internal pressure to wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:11 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:58 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多