几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 single vs double v-weld

single vs double v-weld
we have a fabricator welding a short girder. while the designer had indicated a single v-weld, the fabricator wants to do double v. pros and cons?? help would be appreciated.
check out our whitepaper library.
double v's sometimes have more weld material required to be deposited - look at the cross sectional areas to verify ...this adds to the number of passes required and the associated costs of the weld go up.
the single v will generate a larger mass (generally) of weld (i.e. more passes will likely be required). the larger the mass of weld, the greater the chance for poor weld quality, rework, slag clean up, and everything else associated with multiple passes.
perhaps the fabricator thinks they can achieve the weld with say two passes (one on either side of the v), as opposed to maybe 3-5 if its one large mass from one side?
prep work should be close to the same for either method.
i try use single v myself unless the pl thickness goes past say about +10mm, then i try to stick with double v if possible.
anyone else with comments?
drw
the issues are axial shrinkage, residual stress, prep time, weld time, and amount of filler metals. i agree with drw75, thicker sections are more economical with the double -v. the axial shrinkage, filler metal used, weld time, prep time and residual stress created by the larger number of passes in the single-v weld is much greater than in the double-v weld in thicker sections. the shop is trying to minimize the amount of filler metal to be used and weld time to give you their most economic design.
both joints can be 100% penetration connections and are interchangeable.
thanks so far - the plate is definitely thicker than 10mm.
bigh,
my dime is to remind you of the changes of the metal structure in the heat affected zone. what thickness of plate are you trying to weld? you say that it is thicker than 10mm, anything beyond one inch (sorry i'm an imperial system user), may require preheating (something else to add to your costs) in order to minimise residual stresses due to welding.
i agree with the statement that the shop is trying to give you their most economical, yet efficient design.
double-v is a preferred choice both from the view of economy as well as structural. i specifically re
as follow up - the plates are 32mm and 50mm thick.
all the more reason to go for double-v. it is economical. for 50mm plates, some people even go for j-weld. that is a u like groove in place of v.
ciao.
for plates that thick you should definitely use double-v.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】模拟南方软件下polyline线的输入(并进行修改),不敢独享 - 精华帖集合 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-29 05:37 PM
【转帖】在vba里由基本三角函数导出的三角函数 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:25 PM
在vba里由基本三角函数导出的三角函数 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:33 PM
【转帖】怎么判断对象是否被删除 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-21 12:33 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:22 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多