几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic vertical distribution of load

seismic: vertical distribution of load
equivalent lateral force procedure...
seismic base shear v= cs x w
where:
cs = variable depending on accelerations,response modification, etc.
w = the total dead load (plus applicable portions of other loads)
---------
fx = cvx * v
fx = horizontal seismic force induced at any given level above ground
cvx = variable dependent on a story's weight and height above ground
v = seismic base shear, described above
---------
with all that said, knowing v is the shear at the base of the structure due to the total "weight" of the structure, this means that the lowest half story of structure weight (that portion of the structure from ground level halfway up to first elevated diaphragm) is included in v, correct?
if that's the case, isn't this mass getting dumped directly into the ground level? why would this portion of structural weight be getting distributed to elevated diaphragms?
what am i missing here?
find a job or post a job opening
i'm not sure i fully understand your question. but maybe this will help.
consider a simply supported beam with uniform loading. the reaction at each end is 1/2 of the total load. however, the reaction on one end is not due just to the load on that end. if you remove the load from one half of the beam, the reaction on that end doesn't disappear.
it sounds like a similar issue with the force distributed to the mass in your case- you are assuming that the bottom half of the mass ought not to have any effect at the top- which is not the case.
ichibansan,
as far as i know, the seismic load from the lowest half is not a part of w. this load is tranferred directly to the base.
whyun,
that is the way have always calculated it. however, when i looking at a cmu or concrete shearwall building, i add-in an extra seismic load due to the self-weight of the entire shearwall, including its lower half. this load was not included in seismic vertical distribution. it is added-in while calculating the force for the design of the shearwall.
sacrebleu,
you can put entire wall seismic force at center of wall (midheight) or upper half seismic force at top of wall. end result is the same. what do you think?
the force from the lower half of the wall that goes directly into the ground should not be getting distributed into upper levels.
for the design of the shearwalls and foundation, it should of course be included.
whyun,
the seismic force generated by the vertical shear distribution was already was applied to the top of wall.
if i am adding-in the seismic force generated by the lower half of the wall, i suppose it would be sufficient to apply that load at mid-height.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
ibc seismic eqn 16-28 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:52 PM
ibc seismic effect e huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:52 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
design load distribution member1 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:26 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多