几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic design in un-coded foreign lands

seismic design in un-coded foreign lands
a coworker is researching seismic design for a potential overseas project. usgs data indicates the area has experienced earthquakes as large as 7.6 on the richter scale. historically, this is similar to the seismic activity in the san francisco area. no codes or seismic design information is available for the site.
does anyone know if using the san fransico design parameters and ibc 2000 sufficient for this scenario?
i suppose you could since building codes are prescriptive in nature, employing factors of safety to provide a reasonable level of protection without incurring an inordinate cost for the construction. i would suggest using the army corps of engineers manual on seismic design, ti 809-4 since it is not based on any particular region in the us.
as far as using us codes in foreign countries, i have worked with engineering ministries international, a christian organization which does design and construction management for mission work overseas. they quite often use the ubc for countries where there is no code.
i would second that advice to consult with the corp manuals but would also like to mention or at least clarify one issue.
you need to look into the definitions of the maximum credible event, maximum serviceable event, and the maximum design event. all are quite different and show the various levels of performance that is expected of the building in each seismic event. defining each, on the other hand, will be quite a task especially on foreign soil.
in one you are using the largest event expected for that area which means defining several known faults and noting the attenuation of such an event over the distance of the site with respect to the fault. keeping in mind that some parameters are influenced more by acceleration others by velocity and still others by displacement. the above analysis will be quite specific.
another you are expecting the building to be serviceable following a seismic event and in the last you expect damage but no loss of life.
you really have a handful and should consult with a geotech or earthquake engineer.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
reinforced concrete building design step-by-step huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:12 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:28 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多