几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:11 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 screeds

screeds
i have a project which calls for a 100mm screed to be placed over a strucutral slab. the screed will used by forklifts etc and the design strength is to be 50mpa. the spec recommends that it is placed in two layers with mesh reinfrcement.
are there any definitive guidelines: from what i've found, the mesh would be near to the top of the top layer with suitable cover to control early thermal drying cracks. the mix could be a 1:3 cement :10mm max agregate mix and we are considering two 50mm layers to build the 100mm screed. we will use a system of joints.
i have seen a few screed failures and the resaons were mix design and workmanship. anybody have and views or advice regarding the above or joint layout curing times etc.?
thanks nb
assuming the "screed" you are referencing is the same as a topping slab in the us, you have to make the decision of whether this is to be a bonded screed or an unbonded screed. assuming a bonded screed and minimal reinforcement other than crack control, i would turn my attention to the concrete mix design. the 10mm top aggregate size will increase the cement requirement, thus increasing the shrinkage potential. for a 100mm screed, you can go to a 20mm or 25mm maximum aggregate size but then you should place in one layer, not two. since wire mesh is difficult to work with in any section, i would consider using fiber reinforcement for crack control. the cracks that develop will likely be from drying shrinkage, not thermal unless you place just before a quick temperature drop.
for jointing, assuming that the substrate is a reinforced concrete slab, you should match the existing joints and then consider cutting all joint spacing in half once again. this is because reinforced concrete is typically jointed at greater intervals than non-reinforced concrete, so if you place a non-reinforced slab on top of a reinforced slab, you must decrease the joint spacing, but you must also match the existing joint spacing because of the potential (and probability) of reflective cracking. saw cut the joints to at least 20mm, preferably 25mm within 6 to 8 hours after placement of the concrete. fill all sawcut joints with a flexible sealant after you are sure that cracks have occurred.
with regard to the fiber, i would suggest one of the steel fibers (bekaert dramix or mitchell fibercon). polypropylene fibers can work, but i have had better results from the steel fibers.
good luck.
many thanks i will take it under advisement. unfortunately the specification insists on two layers with a mesh.
your comment about additional cement increasing shrinkage is interesting: is there any experience of mixing pfa (flyash) with the cement to reduce the heat generation?
adding flyash will reduce the heat of hydration as well as reduce the available alkali for potential reactivity if you have suspect aggregates. i have not seen flyash to reduce the shrinkage a great deal, but it likely has some effect on this.
since you must stick with the two layer placement, i would suggest that you still consider a 20mm top size aggregate. secondly, use flat mats, not rolled wire for the welded wire fabric placement. this will make life a bit easier for the placement crew which will likely get you a better result.
also, don't allow vibration in the lower layer, but require vibration as the upper layer is placed. this will allow better mixing of the two layers.
good luck.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:00 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多