几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 07:05 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 risa3d reaction results for wind dont look righ

risa3d reaction results for wind don't look right
the structure in question is a weldment of plates with stiffeners and multiple columns. in plan view it is a rectangle with the side walls having seven columns and six bays for a total of fourteen columns. the center bay has a large stack supported off the four center columns. if you hand calculate wind and dead loads on the center bay the loads at the base plates would be the largest, but risa3d results is pushing everything to the corners of the weldment on the opposing wall and they are the largest load. has anyone ran into this problem?
i've used risa 3d for years and have a high trust in its performance and accuracy. i would bet you have a modeling issue. one of the best things to do is to always first look at your models deflection as this usually reveals how the model is being interpreted and how the matrix solution is panning out.
per your statement "pushing everything to the corners" ... re
i've also been using risa for 10+ years and every funky result was caused by a misfit model. there was one time that my risa output of a truss with unusual geometry didn't at all match someone else's ramadvanse truss model (the ramadvanse model was giving us 0 force web
thanks for your responses. please don't get me wrong, i have been a fan of risa for quite some time (if anyone re
it's sort of difficult to envision your model. if you can post it on a web-photo sharing site (
are you making a finite element model with plates? i have only used that part of risa once, and that was to analyze a glulam beam that had a huge hole cut in the middle. i bet i put 40 hours into that model. before i cut the hole in the middle, i analyzed the beam by hand and with risa (the typical matrix analysis part of it) and messed around with my plate model until i got results that essentially matched the other, then i cut a hole in it.
unless you really know what you are doing, i think it would really be good idea to first get your model to give you the results you already know and then modify it. also read the help for using plates and make sure you aren't doing anything they tell you not to, like use them for diaphragms. also, the smaller the mesh the better and no triangles.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:50 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多