几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 04:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rebar detailing 9offset bars0

rebar detailing (offset bars)
many detailers use offset bars (slightly bent on a 1:6 slope) to facilitate placement of lap splices. my common sense tells me they should not be allowed in areas of maximum tensile stress, but unless i have missed something, aci does not seem to clarify where they can or cannot be used. can anyone advise on this issue?
check out our whitepaper library.
aci 318-02 r12.14 (commentary) says that "splices should, if possible, be located away from points of maximum stress...."
for years, the typical aci detailing manual, and most engineer's, specified the 1:6 taper in columns as starting just beneath the floor and tapering up through the floor thickness such that as the bars came out of the top surface of the floor structure, they would be fully offset to lap with the bars for the column above, which were set in the corners.
aci includes in their detailing manual an alternative method where the offset occurs in an upside-down position.
here's an attempt to describe it:
1. the lower column vertical bars are in the corners, extending straight up, and through the floor above.
2. these bars then extend from the upper floor a distance of the column lap length.
3. the upper column bars are offset to lay just inside the straight bars from below.
4. once the upper bars lap past the straight bars, they begin to taper 1:6 outward to the four corners.
5. at the end of the taper, they then extend straight up through the floor above and the process repeats
this creates the greatest "d" value in the column reinforcing where its needed most - at the column-floor interface.
the old way created a diminished "d" at the floor, where usually the moment is greatest. also with this "old" way, the taper occurs within the column/beam intersection and can cause a lot of interference and congestion while the alternative method only has straight, vertical bars.
i've used this detail on a lot of projects and it works well. you just have to be sure to sort of red flag this for the contractor as most will try to still put them in the "old" / wrong way.
just a reminder, the detail also requires ties to accommodate the horizontal component of the load.
dik
jae
i see a detail # 4 in aci 315-23 with the offset bars in the "upside down" position which provides full moment capacity and makes good sense as it places the "offset" further away from the column/slab or column/beam connections and closer to an inflection point (assuming you are dealing with a rigid frame structure). i assume the other details are for structures with shear walls (no lateral loads on columns).
however what about using offset bars in walls where there are no ties (see dik's comment) or in beams to avoid rebar congestion.
if your wall has moment at its base, then the upside-down method would also add to the "d" of the wall steel. however, most walls aren't designed for that sort of dependence on bending.
you can find your "d" of the steel at the splice where you have a taper. using the reduced "d" you can go back and check the wall. if it works you're good. if it doesn't you can do a little more math and find the locations on your wall where the reduced "d" is acceptable and show those on your plans.
am i missing something?
with walls the lapping bars can be placed side by side in the longitudinal direction, unless they are at very close spacing.
the rebar spacing is indeed very close in many places. orienting the bar laps side by side (rather than front & back) also reduces the areas where we can later drill to install expansion anchors for fixing exterior stone work, so many walls have been detailed with offset bar laps. the offsets are generally placed about 1 meter above the floors, which should put them near an inflection point in a shear wall type structure (assuming the exterior walls carry the horiz. wind loads to the floor slabs in continuous beam action), so i think the offsets in the walls will be ok.
the main problem lies in the column / beam junctions where rebar congestion is very heavy. as a consequence we have reduced our max. aggregate size to 1/2" in many pours. in fact, we are using 1/2" aggregate in all columns, beams and elevated slabs. the eng. has also aurthorized the use of offset bars in the beam steel in order to feed the horizontal bars through the column cages, but i don't feel comfortable with having any offset bars near a column/beam connection, especially in a severe siesmic zone.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partial rebar developmen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:31 AM
microwaves and rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:57 PM
greased rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:07 PM
flame cutting rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:15 PM
epoxy coated rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:26 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多