几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 03:30 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 punching shear capacity of piled slabs

punching shear capacity of piled slabs
checking punching shear of piles, does anyone use the two layers of steel as the area of rebar? i have always used the one layer (in tension zone). seems to be a bit of disagreement in speaking to people on whether 2 layers can be used. i.e. have same rc in top and bottom of slab continuing over pile head.

find a job or post a job opening
i assume you are using the aci code. i think the concrete codes in most countries do not allow an increase in punching shear stress based on slab reinforcing unless there is prestressing present. that used to be the case with the aci also, but i am not current with that code.
this is a good question i have often wondered if ...say shear friction could be included to resist shear....in both punching and beam shear....if its not allowed by aci where is that called out?
it seems to me that the steel is there and would have to fail if the concrete were to fail.
yes that would be my view on it and is certainly the view of other engineers i have spoke to. i am uk based so use british standards, i can't find anything concrete (excuse the pun). in beams in gives various conditions in using top or bottom but nothing combining then. i would think by the way it would work structurally that both layers would contribute? almost wish i was still in college and destructive testing beams to find out.
reading aci 11.7.1 and the commentary r11.7.1, shear friction is intended for applications where there is an interface between materials cast at different times, between concrete and steel, or for precast joints.
research is always done on the type of applications for which a concept is intended. extrapolating research to applications not expected is not appropriate, in my opinion.
if aci intended the shear friction concept to be applied to beams and slabs, then i don't think they would have carefully worded the applications in 11.7.1. they would have simply said that it applies everywhere.
the pile will usually project 1' into the cap, past the bottom layer. it could therefore fail in a cone that does not include the bottom reinforcement.
dont use the bottom reinforcement.
yes but we layer the steel to continue over the pile head, i.e. increased cover to the bottom.
i always use tension reinforcement only.
i'll check the ciria flat slabs design guide when i get to work tomorow.
if you are looking for a design procedure, aci references the crsi design handbook for the precedure to use in designing pile caps. if you don't have a copy, you should buy one. it is very usefull even though the 2002 (latest edition) is based on the '99 aci code. the latest aci code still refers you to the crsi book. i would scan you the procedure but i am afraid of copyright infringement. the procedure treats the pile cap as a deep beam. shear is taken at the face of pile if i can re
i am not looking at shear friction, however the amount of reinforcent has an effect on the ability of the section to resist shear, indeed i don't see how it could be suggested it wouldn't! in the british standard there is a tables/equation for determination and it is quite clear except whether you can combine layers. states somewhere average of tension reinforcement in both directions. i would agree that it is not the steel itself providing the strength but it is the effect of the area of steel present that enhances the ability of the concrete section to resist shear. on the shear at perimeter yes this is based on ability of concrete alone and values are limited to set figues in code. in short at perimeter must be < value specified (concrete only) while at punching shear perimeter shear stress < shear resisitance which is a function of section thickness and area of stee/concrete strength.
i meant to write the design methodology for pile cap design relies only on the concrete. for concrete slab design, we can use shear head reinforcement. i imagine averaging the layers of tension steel is a good enough approach if your code allows it, but i would still just make the cap thicker. it is much easier to construct. for supporting columns, we only use bottom steel for pile cap design and make the cap thick enough to resist punching shear. for supporting heavy machinery, we use bottom and top steel because the caps are usually massive but we still rely only on the thickness of the concrete to resist punching shear.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
increasing shear capacity of a w beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:26 PM
development length of reinforcement in shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:30 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多