几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 02:35 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 press pit design

press pit design
i have designed a pit (size 19鈥檟10鈥檟9.5鈥?deep) that will be located in an existing warehouse. excavation will be down to 11鈥?below finish floor. a contractor has proposed drilling in concrete piers 18鈥?dia. practically side by side as shoring. then installing the 15鈥?retaining wall. this seems like tremendous overkill and is very expensive.
soil is cohesive so the contractor could bench or cut back at a 45 degree slope. however, this would require demolition and repouring of existing concrete floor. there is approximately 18鈥?of clearance aff, which probably limits the installation of sheet piling.
i am looking for ideas on how to support the pit's sides during excavation. all feedback is welcome.
despite your initial reaction, the use of drilled shafts might be a good solution for a number of reasons. bear with me as we don't know all of the issues at hand. since you're working within what might be a constrained area the use of drilling equipment is far less intrusive than that required to seat sheet piling. obviously it is intrusive to over excavate the pit as well. as for cost and time, the drilled shaft construction can be expedited through drilling and placing concrete in every other shaft with the contractor coming back to finish the remaining. what would be nice is: if the contractor redesigned the vertical retaining system such to include the drilled shafts as much as they are permanent. this would eliminate the need for the 15" wall. this assumes that the wall and flooring are or could be seperate.
alternatively, with such a little excavation using an internal bracing system might do the trick. this could be constructed of sheet piling (to hold the walls of the excavation) with a metal pipe connected to the sheet to prevent the walls collapsing inside the excavation. naturally, a stage construction would be necessary to work around the struts. and you probably wouldn't want to do the whole excavation at one time.
you asked for ideas and these are just that. consider trenching and building the walls first. conventional trench shoring could be used. then excavate the pit after the walls are cast placing shores as required during the excavation of the main pit, if necessary for the final design configuration. then cast the bottom slab.
alternative idea. use caisson technology where the walls are built integrally above ground and the structure lowered by subexcavation. this will eliminate the trench shoring.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
dots requiring pe stamps on shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:18 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
calculations personal tool or public record huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:44 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多