几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 01:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 post tensioned strength with no pa

post tensioned strength with no p/a
i am currently setting up a spreadsheet to calculate strengths, stresses etc of prestressed beams ans slabs. i have been instructed to have the option of whether or not to include the p/a component, as sometimes axial deformation cannot occur when the slab is say tied into stiff walls or frames. how should i modify my limit state strength equations and stress equations to allow for this? anyone know where i can look this up?
cheers

this sounds really strange, i would not design pt in this way.
actually p/a will very detrimental if you are restrained from axial deformations, you will need to worry about restraint cracking.
when you are applying a post-tensioning force, you will have an axial force induced in the slab. what do you mean by include or not include p/a?
restraint which prevents the prestress from being effective in areas of the structure mostly affects deflections and cracking, not ultimate capacity. ultimate capacity is still based on all the steel, both bars and strands, being at yield.
yes, but that part is already accounted for in the strength equations. it sounds like he is trying to base the design stresses as if the pt never gets into the concrete?
yeah i assumed the strength equations didnt need to be modified, except in places where axial deformation cannot occur the losses may slightly change.
"yes, but that part is already accounted for in the strength equations. it sounds like he is trying to base the design stresses as if the pt never gets into the concrete? "
i dont necessarily want to base the design stresses as if the pt never gets into the concrete, but i want to include the option of whether or not to include the p/a component in calculating the stresses at transfer etc. in my understanding if the structure cannot physically shorten axially then there is no p/a component, but still uplift due to the tendon drape. so far i have set up a solver in excel that solves for the neutral axis of the section depending on whether its cracked etc, based on a triangular stress distribution and strains in the steel etc. is it at simple as simply misusing p/a from my found stresses at the end or am i missing something? i have a few more questions but i think thats enough for now haha
cheers
i couldn't clearly see the benefits of postensioning slab with restraind edges, instead, i sense some problems need to be looked into/discussed farther, such as pre-load on the support/restrained edges (could be a positive thing to do), cracks (depending on stiffness of the restraind and prestressing force). also, it requires higher prestress force in order to achieve the same result as for an un-restrained slab, wouldn't it? sounds an interesting topic though.
it sounds like you are wanting to treat the pt like a suspension cable only. i guess you could look at the catenary cable formulas to get uplift without compression and apply this load to the concrete as uplift. but i think i would try to avoid the pt loss into restraint elements or use mild steel if it is an extremely stiff frame you are looking at. i might look at what you are talking about if i am checking an existing problem.
chillerz69,
include the prestress force and apply an equal direct tension force (equal to the prestress force) at the centroid of the concrete (cracked centroid) to represent the restraint force
rapt,
could you have a look at the attachments i sent and tell me if that is correct for the limit state at transfer? your help is much appreciated. for the elastic stress analysis should i find the geometrical centroid or the neutral axis assuming a triangular stress distribution in the compression zone? also does the fact that a tendon may be unbonded affect both the limit state transfer equations and the elastic stress equations besides the fact that if its bonded there will be more area of transformed concrete etc?
any help is much appreciated

why don't you just set the p/a to zero? if you use the restraint as a separately applied load wouldn't
that change the results as you go along a multiple span beam with varying widths and section modulus?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
post tensioned slab blow ou huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 01:47 PM
post buckling strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 01:36 PM
concrete compressive strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:53 AM
cast-in-place vs. post-tensioned huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:05 PM
6x6 post strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:55 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:36 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多