几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:59 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 pemb fnd design notes

pemb fnd design notes
i've seen them before, but can't remember where, and now i can't find them.
i'm looking for the exact requirements from the ibc for what should be contained in the general notes of a pemb foundation design.
on all my "real" buildings i follow section 1603 (importance factors, snow/wind/seismic factors, etc) and show all the stuff. but not being the eor, just the foundation engineer, what is required?
find a job or post a job opening
include the design factors used by the metal building company to obtain the reactions you design to, plus the appropriate load combinations used. also include the applicable code, concrete and rebar strength, special inspection notes, if any, and the allowable soil bearing. nothing really elaborate here. been doing these for over 30 years.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
oh... either refer to or show the reactions generated by the metal building company too from which you generated your design reactions.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
you've kind of answered my question, but not really. i'll get more specific.
for example, do you feel like you are still required to list of all items under seismic loading (importance factor, response accelerations, response coefficients, site class, design category, resisting system, base shear, response factor, analysis procedure)?.
listing all of these things, and then stating that you're not the eor, seems almost contrary.
in the course of looking for something else in the code one time, i came across the requirements i'm aksing about. does anybody know where this reference is specifically?
the pemb designer lists all you have shown above. all you really need to do is refer to his calculations and/or drawings, as the plans checker will have a copy of those too.
all you will be stamping is the foundation based on their loads. you are not certifying their building design, or their reactions. you are relying on their reaction numbers though for the foundation design, and need to state that in your structural notes section. no worries.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
mike, i know what you're telling me. i know the pemb dwgs will list all these things. i'm looking for the specific code reference that says i don't have to.
i don't think there is a code reference stating what or how an engineer specifies designs, details designs, or words specific notes.
this is more up to the engineer as to what they want to state as their requirements for their design.
as to eor vs. foundation engineer, i have a question for mike:
in most all cases that i've seen, metal building companies go to great lengths to state that they are not the eor. i've fought this battle before. on every project in the us, traditionally, there must be an eor for each discipline who is responsible for the whole design, not just a part of it.
thus, you cannot have the pemb designer stating that they are only responsible for the pemb...and then also have the foundation designer stating that they are only responsible for the foundation. one of the two must oversee the compilation of the two entities and ensure that they work together.
what has been your experience in your region?
when i do a "foundation only" design, i state that i am not the eor, and don't care all that much about the manufacturer submitting calcs/dwgs.
sometimes there are quasi-pemb designs that get the issue all muddy. for example, i've done several rectangular bldg's that were traditional pemb on shallow foundation on on side, but the grade sloped down steep enough, and the other half of the bldg has a the basement underneath a framed slab and concrete columns extend from low to high to support the pemb. sometimes churchs will use a pemb for the sanctuary, but be traditionally framed roofs and floors that frame into the pemb columns. on projects like these, i'll take the eor tag and be picky with the submittal of calc/dwgs from the supplier.
i just feel really stupid for dedicating 25 lines in my general notes to all the live/wind/snow/seismic factors when i'm only doing the foundation. especially the seismic base shear.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
design build pemb foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
【转帖】notes on drawings not being read yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:00 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:49 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多