几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:46 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 optimum extruded aluminum alloy for lightweigt construction

optimum extruded aluminum alloy for lightweigt construction
we are constructing a superstructure matrix dish for solar collection and have found the 3/8" od drawn t6-6061, .035 wall, more than sufficiently strong, however after bending and drilling it is too brittle and cracks. major concern is for availability of tubing in developing countries, so we can't get too exotic as we prefer off-the-shelf materials , and cost, as well as better machineability. we are wondering if 1/2" extruded even if still t6-6061, would be better, more machineable. appreciate any help.
tadb,
a long time ago before i knew what i was doing, i designed a sheet metal box out of 6061-t6. it did not work very well. the material is not suitable for bending because it is too brittle. i am not aware of problems drilling it, unless you are drilling through the area you weakened by bending.
suggestions:
do not bend the 6061-t6 extrusions. purchase, or design and fabricate corner brackets, and assemble the your structure with nuts and bolts.
if you need rigidity rather than strength, consider 6061 without the heat treatment. this should be bendable. the t6 in the specification indicates heat treatment. do not bother trying to tap holes in the stuff, as it is very soft.
the bendable aluminium is the 3000/5000 series, which is used for sheet metal. i do not think extrusions are available. could you design your structure as an enclosed box?
consider the fact that the mass, and the elastic modulus of steel are three times that of aluminium. if you are building a truss structure loaded entirely in tension and compression, the steel structure will have the same weight and rigidity as the aluminium one. due to the smaller cross sections, it will buckle at a lower load. due to the fact that it is steel, everybody and his dog will know how to fabricate it.
jhg
i suggest switching to al 3003. it is more bendable & readily available in both rigid and coiled tubing.
pretty corrosion resistant, too; as good or better than al 6061.
bendable alloys include 5052-h32
consider using the alloy in anealed condition "o" then heat treating after machining.
we recently studied using glass composite in some structures.
for a quick comparison of properties of a few common al alloys, see
kenvlach,
great. but finding al 3003 or 5052 has not been easy. what industries might use this or where might i look to find a manufacturer or supplier? appreciate the help.
you must not be in the usa. 3003 and 5052 are extremely common alloys, unless you are looking for extrusions (which your initial post stated). in that case, try a 6063-t52 for a bendable extrudable alloy. not as bendable as some, but much better than 6061-t6.
for the al alloys try taber metals, gulfport ms or alcola
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
aluminum tube dome roof connectionsdesign huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:27 AM
aluminum properties huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 AM
aluminum design reference huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:18 AM
aluminum column base plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:17 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:24 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多