几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 02:48 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 moment base plate w tension

moment base plate w/ tension
does anyone know if a moment base plate with tension is taboo? my thought is to use a six bolt pattern and consider the two middle bolts taking all tension and the outer fiber bolts taking the flexural tension. thoughts, please?
galombos,
blodgett's "design of welded structures" has a good explanation and examples of column base plates in my opinion. when eccentricity of the load exceeds 1/6 of the plate uplift will occur which will cause tension in the anchor bolts. there is a long way to calculate this and a short way. if you can't get a copy of blodgett, perhaps someone here can help with another idea, or maybe i could even find my copy of blodgett. i know it's here somewhere.
regards,
-mike
mike, perhaps you misunderstood me. i have column end forces that consist of net uplift and moment
thanks, ted
galambos,
well that makes it more interesting. what i've done in the past is to determine the cross section area and moment of inertia of the bolt group and then calculate p/a and mc/i. it makes sense to me but i've never seen how anyone else does this. i too would be interested in comments or suggestions by others.
regards,
-mike
galambos,
i would apply a portion of the tension force to the outer bolts.
mrmikee,
for bending, where do you take your moment of inertia about?
whilst we are on the subject of baseplates, how do you guys consider prying forces?
tomfh,
the moment of inertia would be about the center of the bolt group which should be at the center of the column to keep things simple. if two bolts of a six bolt pattern are on the na then they could be ignored for bending and load would be just p/6. outside bolts would be p/6 plus or minus force due to bending. i'd check the shear on these too.
as far as prying is concerned; i have never checked base plates for this type of force. in theory it could be a factor but i think it would depend on the details of the layout. maybe next time.
-mike
mrmikee
blodgett treats the baseplate like a concrete beam. if that were the case, then the centroid would not coincide with the baseplate moment of inertia, thus the middle two bolts would in probability take some force, whether it be compressive (ineffective, of course) or tensile. could you agree for the sake of discussion?
galambos,
if there is a force down on the base plate i think the compression in the concrete and tensile forces in the anchor bolts are calculated as if it were a concrete beam, so i think you are right. blodgett has a cubic equation to solve for the neutral axis, which is ok if you have it set up on something like mathcad. if the triangular stress load on the concrete goes out to the middle of the base plate or farther the middle two bolts won't see any load.
on the other hand, if the column force is up there won't be any compression on the concrete, and all the uplift and moment needs to be resisted by the elastic properties of the anchor bolts. like i said previously i have never seen a discussion of this topic anywhere else.
well it seems to make sense now. if anyone else has any questions, comments, or more technical info please post.
-mike
what are your forces galambos? how does the moment induced tension compare with the extra tension?
with a symmetrical bolt pattern, the outer four bolts will carry all the moment. in that case, assuming the center two bolts carry the tension is unconservative. i would assume the tension was evenly divided, so the bolts loaded in tension by the moment would be highest stressed. ie, it would be mc/i +/- p/a.
the issue of stress distribution in an anchor bolt pattern has reared its ugly head before, and i am not aware of a good answer. the idea that one should analyze the concrete section immediately below the surface as a concrete beam sounds fine, except that it is equally reasonable to analyze the steel section right above the surface, and these two analyses will give you different bolt force distributions. the problem is that in either case, designs intended for long beams are being applied to end sections.
do the anchor bolts rest on leveling nuts? or do they rest on concrete? i use the bolt group moment of inertia method to determine the individual bolt loads. then i size the base plate to resist moments created by the bolt loads. the trick is to determine the width of the plate that resists the bending moment.
if the gap between the concrete and the bottom of the base plate is less than 2 bolt diameters, you can neglect the bolt bending according to asce manual 72.
_____________________________________
i have been called "a storehouse of worthless information" many times.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
design approach for anchor rod plate washers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:12 PM
base plate thickness and bolt preload huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:27 PM
base plate design- simple design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:25 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
base plate anchor rod hole size huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:28 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多