几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:09 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 load rating of existing bridges

load rating of existing bridges
does anyone know a source for info on how to load rate an existing bridge (relatively small two-lane, one center span and two end spans)when there is no design information or drawings available? i assume field inspections and some sort of testing are in order, but to what standard?

usually field measurements are taken and everything is measured. everything! i assume you already have the necessary documentation for load rating. in many of states i work in the dot provides information for load rating regarding bridge types and information of the material dominant for certain periods construction.
also, it wouldn't be a bad idea to contact the dot's bridge management staff to see if any information is available from "off-system" bridge inspections. all states are required to have this type of information and is collected or the bridge revisited every other year.
much of the information necessary for determining the loading is easily identified, i.e., roadway width, curb and parapet dimensions, slab thickness, wearing surface limits and thickness, beam depth and cross-section (older "s" beams are readily identified over "i" beams), and haunch thicknesses. also, diaphragms are readily visible for measurement.
you can see the faq here in this section for how to find steel properties for the beams.
load testing is seldom used. testing coupons taken from the structure is not so common but many agencies are reluctant to pay for that service if it can be avoided.
one last comment, if you're dealing with steel and a possible construction date prior to 1960 the construction is probably not composite.
good luck
thanks for reply. unfortunately, bridge is on "private property" and is not in the dot system. and it consists of prestressed concrete
if the concrete girders were pre-cast, there will be a manufacturers stamp on each girder along with the year of manufacture. with luck, the manufacturer is still around. if not, it may be possible to compare the section properties with those sections manufactured around that date.
most pre-cast suppliers conformed to a the basic girder layout and reinforcment design in order to get easier approvals for the transportation department. furthermore, very few private bridges are designed from scratch, rather they are typically bought "off the shelf". your local pre-caster can help you with the specifics.
once you have a good idea of the original design, a good source of info for evaluating and rating existing bridges is the ontario bridge design code and the commentary.
i used ot work in the michagan dept of trans bridge management program. previous posters are quite correct. initially you need to create a drawing of the bridge. any damage or failure must be noted. since the structure is presstressed, you will need manufactures shop drawings to assess the capacity. software is usually used to assess the structural capacity of each and every
penndot has a prestressed girder rating/analysis program ps3 that it relatively easy to use. i'm not sure how to get this program unless you're a consultant to penndot, but you might try their web site. given load and geometry inputs, it outputs easy-to-read inventory and operating ratings.
as far as references go, try checking out the aashto manual for condition evaluation for bridges (1994 with 1995 interim) if you haven't already.
hi
can't answer question directly, but am interested in how and what you measure as my field is geomatics deformation measurements. often find that engineers can't tell me exactly what and where measurements are needed. if i can help let me know, otherwise will follow this discussion with interest
in addition to gathering your field measurments, you may want to rent a reinforcement locating instrument. this may give you a more accurate idea of what is in the concrete. you may luck out, and the heel of the beam at the abutment may be broken off, exposing the strand ends, or rebar. check out the dot websites for a program called bars - bridge rating analysis system. it is used in everywhere, i know it is on the ohio dot site. for your simple span, you are going to need the span lengths, deck composition for dead load calculations, beam spacing, and beam properties. do not forget to measure any section loss, concrete or steel. if you have trouble, post back, and i will walk you through the process.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
existing steel column analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:59 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
coverplating existing columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:16 PM
arema rating steel bridge load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:50 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:11 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多