几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:15 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 lifting beam design

lifting beam design
i am load rating 2 previously constructed lifting beams. i have found that asme b30.20 requires a 3.0 safety factor against yielding. does osha require a more stringent safety factor? i have found on the internet that ontanio osha requires a 5.0 safety factor against failure.
furthermore, what is your opinion of how the satefy factors should be implenmented?
to give a couple of easy examples of how i interpret the proper implentation of the safety factors is:

bending: fb=.6fy/3.0 and
shear rupture: fv=.3fu/5.0
does anyone see this a different way?
check out our whitepaper library.
im not familar with this standard but i think what you are doing is going overboard. fy/3.0 is a 3.0 factor of safety against yielding. fy is the yield stress. .6fy is the asd allowable stress. similar for shear rupture. i dont think you need to apply both factors.
i have concluded that you are correct.
i instead multiplied my live loads by 1.8. since asd uses an approximate 1.67 factor for yield, 1.8*1.67=3.0. this satisfies the 3.0 safety factor requirement.
anyone have comments on this approach?
im a bit confused by your last post. does the asme standard use allowable loads or ultimate loads? if they use allowable loads, i.e. being compatible with asd:
assume 36 ksi steel:
fy=36
your allowable stress=36ksi/3=12ksi
fu=58
your allowable shear rupture=58ksi/5=11.6ksi
now if the asme standard uses ultimate loads..
apply lrfd load factors to your live and dead loads to get a total load. use the ultimate strength of the steel, so for 36ksi steel use 58 ksi.
your allowable yield stress now equals: 58/3=19.33 but your loads are factored.
does this make sense?
do you have mill test reports on your steel?
practically all of our structural work is "a36". but i understand that much of the material we use is actually dual-certified, with a higher yield strength (maybe 50 ksi, not sure). anyway, worth checking on.
i'm not sure what you're actually making -it sounds like what i hear called a spreader bar- if so, aisc-asd may be governed by buckling due to lack of lateral support, or column buckling, rather than by yielding.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
concrete edge beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:02 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:52 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:32 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多