几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 07:12 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 impact load

impact load
if i drop a mass of 100 lbs from a height of 5 ft to a 10 ft simply supported beam (at the middle), how do i find out the actual moment/effect due to impact? i would appreciate help. i know it has something to do with impact loading, but i am not sure how to analyze.
there are a bunch of threads about this. search the forum. biggest problem is determining the de-acceleration either in time or deflection. if you have either of these you can find what you need.
testing is often the best way, i have heard that .3 0r .2 seconds is often used.
you actually have a classic single degree of freedom system there so the answer is straightforward. work out the spring stiffness, then you can just match pemass_initial=kemass_at_impact= elasticenergy in beam to get a max deflection.
m*g*h=1/2*k*y^2
then drop the deflection y back into your beam equation.
obviously this ignores the local stresses due to impact.

cheers
greg locock
greg's way is best since it elegantly sidesteps all the deceleration period nonsense.
it is worth noting that greater flexibility is your friend in this case as the more the beam deflects the lower the acceleration.
a short column shape beam with a high strength/stiffness ratio would be best (unless there are other factors).
why does acceleration matter?

what csd72 is referring to is deceleration, and it matters because f=ma.
if you know the deceleration of the object, you can calculate the force it imparts on the beam.
the energy method, as stated before is an alternate method. i haven't thought through the method thoroughly, but i see no reason why it wouldn't be fine.
in reality the rate of decceleration does not affect the beams capacity, so why pretend it does?
tom,
you have obviously forgotten your physic fundamentals:
as f=ma, if you reduce the acceleration and you reduce the force.
frv,
deceleration is just acceleration in the opposite direction, as far as physics is concerned there is no difference other than the direction.
reducing the acceleration does reduce the force, but it also increases the duration of the force so that the same amount of work gets done.
but the beam doesn't care if the load duration is 5 or 10 or whatever milliseconds, it is the magnitude of the load that dictates if the beam is adequate.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
impact load factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:11 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
design of concrete foundation for impact load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:37 PM
deisgn of steel hopper for impact loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:05 PM
asce 7 - impact loading for bulkheads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:18 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多