几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 h-beam metric to w-beam imperial conversion

h-beam metric to w-beam imperial conversion
my company is bidding a project in which the structural material is all metric. we are used to working in 'american' units (imperial), and do not have a good source for metric materials, so i would like to be able to find the equivalent imperial sizes needed.
the sizes are called out as thus (example): h400x400x13x21
this is a 'h'eavy beam according to the h designation correct? is this the equivalent of a wide flange (w) beam in imperial units? also, obviously the first 400 is the height, the second 400 the width of the flange, but what do the 3rd and 4th numbers designate? one is most likely a weight/length value, but is the other the thickness of the web, or flange? which is which, and in what units?
and finally, does anyone know where i can get a conversion chart so i don't have to do the metric-imperial conversion and then try to match the values to my structural handbook? thanks in advance for any help.
drew
that one is a jis (japanese) beam: 13 (mm) is web thickness, 21 flange thickness.
in the first site below, under beams -> cross sections -> i beams -> parallel you'll find jis beams, as well as europeans (he) and others.
however you won't find a reliable equivalence table anywhere: you'll need to decide yourself whether you want to compare on weight, main axis inertia, main axis modulus, secondary axis... etc.
prex
shapes like the one you listed are not generally rolled steel sections like your wide flange beams, but rather are welded beams fabricated from plate with continuous welding.
ah, i see, that's why every time i searched for h-beams it came up with japanese beams and manufacturers . . . it makes sense now.
so if these are not typically rolled steel sections, then i guess we could possibly fab them, but that's a lot of welding . . . i'll have to see what we can do on pricing the beams from different sources before going that route.
i can always do as you stated prex and compare mechanical properties to determine equivalency, but as we did not design the structures we do not have executive decision on the material props necessary for the calculated loading.
thanks for the info - that helps a lot!
drew
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cross beam bolted connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 03:55 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】error c2664 yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 09:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:56 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多