几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:18 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 grout integrity outdoors

grout integrity outdoors
i've got a steel framework above an existing roof that is expected to support a very large condensing unit. the two main support beams span 40 feet and are w27 beams. the condenser manufacturer had specified a maximum 1/2 inch deflection which resulted in the heavy beams. i specified a 1" positive camber (the minimum camber for that shape) with an expected downward deflection under unit weight of about .7 inches. this would place the unit on a steel support that would be ultimately cambered about .3 inches.
the problem is that now the manufacturer wants the steel to be more level than what is provided (in other words, he's asking for a "flat" surface and doesn't care what the ultimate downward deflection ends up...the 1/2" limit was for wind loads).
what we want to do is remove the unit, and install a more level steel shape, like a tube, atop the beams. the plan is to grout the space between the "flat" tube and the cambered beam after shimming and setting the tube. we would eventually weld side plates from the tube to the top flange to permanently tie everything together.
would standard, non-metallic, non-shrink grout be appropriate here? the owner has expressed some reservations about whether, over time, the grout would break up with the small flex in the beams and the exposure to freeze-thaw cycles (we're in the midwest u.s.).
would an epoxy grout or some other product be more appropriate?
find a job or post a job opening
jae...i would use an epoxy grout, preferably filled with oven dried sand or with metallic blast grit. bond between steel and grout will likely break (eventually), but will last longer with epoxy than cementitious.
note that epoxies have high coefficient of thermal expansion, so thermal fatigue on the bond will likely be a consideration. if shaded, it will help.
ron
thanks for your reply, ron.
the thermal expansion issue was a concern with the epoxy grout. this is above a large warehouse-type roof and exposed to midwest temperatures (100 deg f in summer to -10 deg f in winter). one side faces north so would be in the shade. the other is southern exposure...
the metalic grit....i thought of that as i know that metallic grout has a higher ductility than non-metallic. but...does the metallic ingredient rust over time when exposed to the outdoors?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
grout instead of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:17 PM
grout hole requiremen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:17 PM
grout failure under base plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:16 PM
deep grout beds under steel columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:41 PM
5000psi grout as a structural footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:52 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:53 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多