几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 11:30 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 fema 450 and allowable stress design factor for seismic forc

fema 450 and allowable stress design factor for seismic forc
fema 450, in its section on the design of architectural, mechanical and electrical components, chapter 6, has a method of converting the calculated seismic forces to those that can be used in codes that still use working stress methods for their acceptance criteria.
section 6.2.6.1 "allowable stress design" gives this expression for converting the strength design seismic forces that are calculated using eqn 6.2-1 to those that can be used in acceptance criteria that are in terms of allowable stresses:
"the earthquake loads determined in accordance with the provisions shall be multiplied by a factor of 0.7."
i am dealing with the seismic design of asme b31.3 process piping at elevations substantially above grade and am interested in reducing the design forces that are determined from eqn 6.2-1 to a minimum. i am keen to find out the theoretical background for this factor of 0.7 so i feel comfortable using it.
the commentary to fema 450 does not refer to or add any elucidation to how they came to use this figure. in the past i have seen structural codes that were in transition between working stress and strength methods and so have quoted load combination equations for both analysis methods. the figure they used tended to be a factor of 0.8 rather than 0.7.
i would be interested to receive any thoughts on how fema came up with this conversion.
in structural codes earthquake loads are given at the ultimate level (factored) with the equations used. to convert from the ultimate level to a working stress level load combinations that i have seen, namely in the asce 7 i believe, multiply the earthquake load e by a coefficient of 0.7. it's not a "stress increase" nor is it related to duration of loading, it's just keeping things consistent with lrfd or asd instead of mixing the two. i am pretty sure this is what i read and will look it up in the asce 7 when i get to work.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:41 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多