几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 11:29 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 fem please help1

fem please help!
i'm struggling to grasp the "finite element method".
can anyone help explain it in simple terms?
check out our whitepaper library.
finite element method evaluates the stress/strain of a structural at defined points, called nodes. nodes are interconnected to make a structure by elements. elements can represent linear elements (rods or beams), planar elements (plates or membranes), or solids (3d pieces). loads are applied at nodes as required. constraints are applied to nodes to "ground" the model (ie provide the reaction loads to keep the model in equilibrium).
try looking here:
do you understand how a frame analysis works? such as a beam element with various degrees of freedom at each end like x, y, z translation and x, y, z rotation?
well, think of this as a 2 node finite element.
you can also develop stiffness/force relationships between 3 node, 4 node, etc. elements. essentially the same thing except that you now have to make assumptions as to how the forces distribute between the "other" nodes. for a 2 node element - the force simply reacts to the other singular node.
because of the multiple nodes and the assumption as to how the stiffness and forces relate, you find that you can only satisfy one of the two following aspects of the structure:
1. force equilibrium
2. boundary condition compatibility (i.e. - the nodes from one element deflect the same way as the adjacent element sharing the same node).
since you can't satisfy both, and you really don't want a disjointed structure after you apply the forces (i.e. you want to satisfy no. 2 above). you allow for approximation in the force equilibrium.
so using many smaller elements reduces the error in force equilibrium and you get a pretty close answer.
a couple of examples that i often use it for in building design are:
areaway wall analyzed as a plate with pinned bottom, fixed sides and a free top. i apply a triangular earth load to it (plus a uniform surcharge if adjacent to traffic or parking).
concrete mat foundation with multiple column loads
concrete balcony supported on 3 sides
i am sure there are many other examples. with today's software programs, most of these problems can be modeled and solved within 5 minutes.
good luck!
the finite element method is an approximate method used to solve differential equations. in structural engineering, these equations are those governing stress and strain relationships. the solutions taken at node locations are considered "exact". the fem uses these solutions at nodes and interpolates for the values between the nodes. as you can imagine, the type of interpolation will govern just how exact your solution at a given point may be. in order to reduce error introduced by this interpolation, you can use more nodes, or make smaller elements.
the interpolation functions are built in to the type of element you want. for the constant strain triangle, strain is assumed to be constant across the element from node to node. with the linear strain triangle, strain varies linearly across the triangle. now we know that in many cases, the strain is not constant nor does it vary linearly through an element, but if you make each increment small, so that you have more nodes where the solution is better, then your results will also become better.
fem is used for heat transfer analysis as well as fluid dynamics, among other things. what's important to re
fem is an approximate method used to analyze complex indeterminate structures or elements of a stucture with a computer.
a simple explanation is that each element is discretized (that is broken down into smaller elements that are determinate). the forces, strains, and stresses are then solved for each discretized element. the discretized elements are then reassembled to give results through compatibility. the more discretized elements that are made (the more pieces that the original element is broken up in) the more convergence on the the "real" solution, i.e. the more accurate the solution.
this method can only be accomplished by a computer because the computations are immense.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fea for regular two way slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:23 AM
equivalent frame fem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:48 PM
dimension of shell 9plate0 element in fem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:48 PM
【转帖】solids Not Rendered Anymore, Please Help1 yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 04:11 PM
【转帖】help1 --dd-nonlibs.zip92.020 cant open1 yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:07 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:12 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多