几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 08:56 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 existing overstresses

existing overstresses
when doing an evaluation of an existing building, what is the maximum stress for members where you can say the member is still safe, i have heard that 5% to 10% overstresses are still ok. is there any code reference in the united states regarding this issue?
thanks

significant overstress is normally only allowed for temporary construction or occasional loads.
i know of no code guidance for this issue. i have developed my own parameters:
new construction -- 5% overstress allowed
verifying existing construction -- 10% overstress allowed
justifying my own mistakes after something is already built -- 15% overstress allowed
just another couple of thoughts when evaluating an existing building structure:
1. do you check it using code required loads at the time it was constructed or current code loads? the same questions could be asked regarding material stresses.
2. do you make an assement of the actual loads the building is seeing and check it with those? if so, would this control over the code requirements? in otherwords, if the actual loads are less than code specified minimums, would you "pass" an existing building even if it didn't meet code loads? would it then be appropriate to post load limits?
when checking existing structures or portions of structures, i would use a more accurate calculated dead loads. original design probably used a dead load that is somewhat more conservative than the weight of the finished structure.
all the calculation procedures to verify the adequacy of existing elements shall be based on current code.
material strengths shall be based on the older stresses that were allowed at the time of construction. if it is not available, test some samples to get an estimate or use whatever stresses that are reasonable.
especially in wood, the current allowable stresses are so low (due to the depletion of older forests and the available lumber today are from younger forests and are not as dense). when dealing with older wood structures, framing maybe overstressed even without adding new loads if checked with current allowable values.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
existing beam help huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:51 AM
enlarging existing footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:33 PM
coverplating existing columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:16 PM
connecting a new foundation to an existing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:09 PM
【转帖】rendering On Existing Mfc Device Conte yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 02:57 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:32 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多