几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 06:23 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 determination of togographic factor, kzt in asce

determination of togographic factor, kzt in asce
hi everyone,
does anyone know to determine the topographic factor, kzt per asce 7-05. most of the time we do not even have the information, such as whether our structure is on an escarpment, or on a 2-d ridge or 3-d axisymmetrical hill. does anyone have any luck using figure 6-4 on page 45 of asce 7-05. do we just assume that the effect of wind speed-up shall not be required to be considered and just use 1.00? or do we take a figure like, 0.85, just to allow for some uncertainty in the effect of wind speed-up, but not have to go through the process of determining kzt? the process does look a tad involved, and we might not have all the information hand to use the tables correctly.
any advice or suggestions, please? what is the best thing to do in these cases? what is your own experience in this?
thanks, y'all.
you need to have a good read of the commentary for this section and go throught the numbers at least once so that you can get a feel for it.
i have not used the topographic factor for asce7-05, but in my experience with other codes these factors are for major geographical features and are not usually significant.
i would not think this would be significant for any sea cliff/escarpment less than 300' high or a hill less than 500' or a slope less than 1 in 4, but you should really do some numbers to get a feel for this.
i always check the location of my jobs on mapquest/google to see if they are in an area that may have these issues. if it is in one of these areas then try to get your hands on a contour map so that you can do the calculation.
the factor only applies if all the conditions apply, 1-5 of 6.5.7.1. the factor if used is allways greater than 1.0, (use 1.0 if no speed up is attributed to geography). the 0.85 that you cited is not a easily arrived at value since k1 k2 and k3 are multiplied together, added to one and then squared.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
base shear calculation fron ibc and asce-7 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:29 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
asce 7-98 wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:20 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:22 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多