几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 05:12 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 design beam for fall arrest anchorage

design beam for fall arrest anchorage
in this thread
other question: i couldn't find any document related to direction of 5,000 lbs. does this load have to be applied in vertical direction only?
thank you,
iv

q1: without check into details, c4 seems odd to me for the 9' span. please note that the 5,000# is the osha requirement on strength for personal fall arrest devices such as harness and lanyard. however, if i re
i thought that the 5000 pounds was the minimum failure load of the support structure. if you want to add an additional fos, feel free.
the fialure direction is the one that the safety line will pull in when a worker is suspended by it. if that could be in more than one direction, so be it.
per osha's website...
"(10) anchorages to which personal fall arrest equipment is attached shall be capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kn) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two, under the supervision of a qualified person."
since it does not appear that you meet the qualifications of a 'qualified person', as designated by osha, you need to design for 5,000 lbs, imho. it is possible to design for less.
as far as i know, osha does not specify an angle for the reaction. i have used 30 degrees from vertical in the past. i would feel uncomfortable using a channel and even moreso using a c4. it seems it would be very sensitive to any eccentricity.
also, the 10,000 lbs minimum factored design force has been eliminated from aisc's specification and is not necessary.
from the majority of fall arrest systems we have looked at, there ends up being as much horizontal load as vertical loads. for this, i would suggest a hss section. would you also not have to look at torsion?
we end up for the most part giving them travel restraint rather than fall arrest for these reasons.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete edge beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:02 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:52 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:33 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多