几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 09:42 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 cmu wall reinforcing

cmu wall reinforcing
good afternoon gentleman,
i have designed a cantilevered masonry wall which will reach 6'-0" above grade. it is in florida with a wind speed of 120 mph. the vertical reinforcing calculations are indicating that i need #5 bar at 24" o.c. the builder has built this wall in the past using a design from another engineer with the #5 bar at 48" o.c. i used asce 7 and aci 530 for my design. if anyone has any experience with walls such as these, please chime in and offer a suggestion on spacing.
thank you,
ss
find a job or post a job opening
did you use the reinforcing steel stress increase, screen wall pressures and i=0.77?
my wall pressure was at around 17psf with the "i" reduction, etc. i did not think we could take the 1/3 increase for steel anymore.....
i don't believe you can use the 1/3 increase for steel anymore. however, the new ibc has a section on ultimate strength design for masonry, and sometimes you can get better results with usd.
daveatkins
the aci 530 allows the increase for rebar stress.
the ibc forbids the use of the 1/3 increase which overrides aci 530.
however, the florida building code still permits the 1/3 increase.
well, 1/3 increase or not, how does everyone feel about the spacing being 24" vs. 48"?
it seems a bit conservative to me.
what was your moment, and soil cover to top of footing?
moment was 310 ft-#, using 17.2psf at 6 feet and wl^2/2. now that i am running numbers i am seeing that i may have miscalculated. how would the soil on top of the footing help with bending of the wall?
i get that #4 @ 48" oc works.
daveatkins
i agree w/ #4 @ 48" dave.
is the 17.2 psf based upon c&c?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cmu wall reinforcing and grouting heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:41 AM
cmu wall on top of wide flanged beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:41 AM
cantilever retaining wall or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:39 PM
buttress wall relative rigidity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:57 PM
anchoring an exterior cmu fdn wall to s.o.g huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:05 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:54 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多