几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:03 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 calculating seismic nonbuilding component-asce 7-02, 9.14

calculating seismic nonbuilding component-asce 7-02, 9.14
i'm a mechnical engineer and have designed a base frame to support 8 motor driven components. per customer i have to design to meet asce 7-02, 9.14.
i find that in section 2.0, combinatins of loads,equations 2.3.2.5 and 2.3.2.7 are the ones applicable to this case.
so, the questions are;
1) how do i used the e values. equasions 9.5.2.7- and -2 imply i should use both values to see which has most affect, right?
2) i'm using an fea software to do the analysis. to use the forces, i have to convert them to accelerations. how do you split the combinations of loads for horizontal and vertical?
should i go all the way back to equ. 9.5.2.7- and -2?
i'm confused about how to apply forces and accelerations.
i've done some of this non-building structure stuff only from the civil-structural side though.
are you designing the mechanical components to meet a wind/seismic event? or is this intended for anchorage?
i only have the 7-05 on me but i'd guess seismic coeff for mechanical/electrical components are addressed in 13.6. is that the same chapter as 9 in the 7-02?
i'm designing to meet seismic requirements. yes, chap. 9 of 7-02 is the same as chap. 13 of 7-05.
looking at 7-05 chap. 12.4, i believe i understand for non-buildings, paragraph 12.4.2.3, strength design, i would use #5 for upward seismic acceleration and #7 for downward seismic acceleraton. is that correct? many times our customer gives us different sds values for vertical and horizontal. in which case sds(vert) is applied to the 0.2sds part and sds(horz) is applied to qe (qe=fp of non-building)of both #5 and #7 , correct?
comparing 7-05 with 7-02 i'd say the same cases apply to 2.3.2 of 7-02. it is just not explained as clearly as in 7-05.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
base shear calculation fron ibc and asce-7 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:29 PM
asce-7 seismic requirements for small buildings structures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:25 PM
asce 7-05 seismic provision huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:12 PM
asce 7 versus awwa d100 seismic loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:58 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:38 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多