几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:53 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bundling reinforcing vs. minimum spacing

bundling reinforcing vs. minimum spacing
is there a penalty in strength for using bundled bars to reinforce concrete beams as opposed to bars spaced out correctly? other than longer minimum lap length for tension development, i can't seem to find anything.
the basis for my question comes from site visits. occasionally, in an 8" joist, the two bars in the bottom will be essentially touching. it seems like it would be ok, as this is no different than bundling bars, even though the mininum is 3/4" spacing.
i'd like to hear everyone's thoughts and opinions on this.
for flexure in beams, the max. flexure is usually at midspan or at the support and the way the longitudinal steel is detailed, the bundling doesn't affect the
φmn of the beam. however, aci does have requirements for developing this longitudinal reinforcing and this is affected by the bundling (as you mention above). a few aspects i can think of:
1. developing positive moment past supports (aci 318 - 12.11.3)
2. cutoff locations for negative reinforcing (12.12)
3. hook development lengths
4. class a laps required for structural integrity in 7.13.
5. distribution of steel per 10.6 would force you into spreading out the bars anyway.
thanks jae. basically confirming what i knew, just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything i hadn't considered.
won't it affect your calculated maximum crack width?
hg
i would either bundle the bars or not. leaving a small space (less than the minimum but greater than zero) could lead to honeycombing.
ucfse, when they're bundled, only one small point is in contact (two circles touching), with a small gap between the rest of it. i'd imagine a 1/4" gap between them would actually be better in terms of honeycombing than no gap at all, as there would be more room for concrete to get into.
if the bars are not going to be in contact (bundled in a horizontal plane as illustrated in fig 3-2 of pca aci 318 notes)then:
1. the clear distance between bars in a layer shall be the larger of db, 1 inch or 1.33 x msa ..aci 318 sec 7.6.1, or
2. if bars are in same vertical plane, then clear distance shall be 1 inch...aci 318 sec 7.6.2
the reason for this is to prevent inter-alia, honeycombing as pointed out by ucfse...aci 318 r7.6
is the bar size no.6..what is the msa of the concrete mix?
it's better for the bars to be resting against concrete, failing this it's better for the bars to be resting against each other,
what you don't want is air beside the bars.
unless you've got a very runny mix and a very small aggregate size the bars should not be too close together without touching.
if you end up with air beside the bars you will later end up with water beside the bars and that's bad.
thanks everyone for the advice. i'm failing to understand how two bars with a 1/4" gap between the bars is worse than two bars with no gap. touching each other doesn't "help", and there is a smaller gap (between the inside faces) if they're touching, meaning it'd be harder for concrete to get between them, meaning there would be more honeycombing? i'm probably off on the likeliness of honeycombing. can someone explain this better?
i think that all this talk about gaps/air etc. is valid, but its primarily valid where you are trying to develop the bars, and has no effect on the flexural calculations, such as at midspan of a beam....agree?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
bond beam spacing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:19 PM
anchor bolts spacing basement walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:53 AM
acip pile reinforcing design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:07 AM
aci minimum area of steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:58 AM
1 minimum in concrete columns what is the theory huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:24 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:35 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多