几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 02:06 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 axial tension for reinforced concrete column

axial tension for reinforced concrete column
situation where i have axial tension on a reinforced concrete column. i don't due alot of concrete design so please bear with me. crack control isn't an issue as in like a water tank design. my 11th edition of design of concrete structures equation 1.14 says p=fy*as, but the next proceeding line states "to provide adequate safety, the force permitted in a tension member under normal service loads should be of order of 1/2p". i don't understand the service load portion? can't i just use my .9 phi factor and use my ultimate load in equation 1.14?
i've always used the following:
req'd as = pu
-------
φfy
where pu is the factored axial tension force
fy is the yield of the rebar (usually 60 ksi)
this gives you the required strength check for the
req'd as = pu
-------
?fy
i messed it up again....just to clarify the equation, here's a third try:
req'd as = pu
-------
φfy

thanks jae
i have a fairly large prefab metal building (225'x350'). i'm tying the bases of each column for each frame together to take out the horizontal thrust loads. my loads are great enough where i need actual grade beam/tension
i would take the service limit as a limit on cracking. it may be based on experience or research, but if a text has made it to the 11th edition, then the authors are probably pretty knowledgeable. i wouldn't just discount their recommendation without a lot of thought.
i would provide much more reinforcement than required just to limit cracking.
". . . to provide adequate safety, the force permitted in a tension
something else to keep in mind is the anchor bolts.
with uplift at the column base, consideration will have to be given to the anchor bolt embedment, and how that tension load is transferred to the rebar, verifying adequate edge distance at your piers, and consideration of possible conflicts between anchor bolt locations and vertical rebar and pier ties.
on the last metal building foundation i did, the metal building manufacturer would not specify the anchor bolt length, so you might want to tie down who is responsible for that.
thanks everyone! all your comments are greatly appreciated. with the reinforcing i will be calling out, my service load will be less than 1/2p. so i do also meet this limit as the text book suggests.
jkw05-yes, i will be responsible for the anchor bolt length. i will be verifying embedment, edge distance, etc.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
another aci slender column question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:13 PM
add steel base plate for new column to existing post-tension huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 AM
aci appedix d concrete pryout strength d.6.3 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:54 AM
4 ply - wood column 9i need help fast110 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:44 AM
28 day vs. 56 day concrete breaks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:52 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多