几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 12:57 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7 rooftop structures factor

asce 7 rooftop structures factor
in calculating wind forces on a piece of equipment going on a roof, i noticed that asce 7-05 has added section 6.5.15.1 which says to multiply my wind forces by a factor of 1.9 this has caught me by surprise. any ideas why we are basically doubling our forces now? and if that is the case, why would we only do it for buildings under 60'? i looked in the commentary but there is nothing on this section.
fss...here's what the asce 7-05 commentary says:
asce 7-05 requires the use of fig. 6-21 for the determination of the wind force on small structures and equipment located on a rooftop. because of the small size of the structures in comparison to the building, it is expected that the wind force will be higher than predicted by eq. 6-25 due to higher correlation of pressures across
the structure surface, higher turbulence on the building roof, and accelerated wind speed on the roof. there is now a very limited amount of research to provide better guidance for the increased force [ref. c6-99]. based on this research, the force of eq. 6-25 should be increased by a factor of 1.9 for units with area less than(0.1 bh). because the multiplier is expected to approach 1.0 as
a f approaches that of the building (bh), a linear interpolation is included as a way to avoid a step function in load if the designer wants to treat other sizes. the research only treated one value of a f (0.04 bh).
the research also showed high uplifts on the top of rooftop air conditioning units, although the net uplift on the units was not measured. the consensus of the committee is that uplift forces may be a significant fraction of the horizontal force. hence uplift load should also be considered by the designer.
ron
thanks. i looked again and found the commentary text in my copy now that you so kindly typed it out. i guess looking for commentary on the actual section number was my downfall.

you erroneously assumed there was some sort of organization to it!!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7 - impact loading for bulkheads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:55 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM
【转帖】getting correct text size and width factor yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 11:28 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多