几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 11:25 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 is dimensioningdetailing in isometric view acceptable

is dimensioning/detailing in isometric view acceptable??
my senior design checker and i are trying to determine whether dimensioning/detailing parts and assemblies in isometric views is acceptable to the standards (asme y14 series).
looked through 14.3 and the first part of 14.5 and didn't see it explicitly stated.
both of us are of the opinion it's generally a bad idea and we don't like it but we're trying to verify whether that's actually based on the standards or just ingrained prejudice!
if anyone knows for sure the answer or where we need to look please let me know.
(plus for now can we stick with the world of 2d drawings, obviously this question doesn’t really make sense for mbd.)
check out y14.41
"wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
ben loosli
sr is technologist
l-3 communications
from my limited knowledge of what y14.41 is about doesn't it refer to digital information, especially 3d?
i'm talking about 2d drawings that effectively get 'printed' albeit normally to pdf not hard copy.
would 14.41 still be applicable?
ken
ben is correct. while it doesn't specifically address assembly drawings, it does allow for detailing of axonometric views.
we've been talking about trying to get a copy of 14.41 for a while now, maybe now's the time then.
thanks to both of you,
ken
you should try to get a copy of 14.41. it doesn't only involve 3d modeling, but also covers the drawing details of the mbd. in addition, there are updates to gd&t that will probably be included in the next release of y14.5 (profile tolerancing for example).
here we have yet another case of a general question with no specifics and a bunch of general answers that may or may not address the object the questioner had in mind.
the detailing and demension is normal subject specific.
example: complex piping systems are best displeyed in isometric. they can easily be detailed and demensioned in the isometric view.
so what is the object being detailed and demensiond?
complex piping systems may be more easily defined in an iso view, but i would suggest checking the applicable standard to determine if they are allowed.
it was an intentionally general question. it isn't regarding a specific drawing or application. we are in the process of setting drawing standards for our section of the company and it was in support of this i was raising the query. currently they don't have any real standards, they don't even really follow the y14 series.
piping is one of the areas our checker said he had extensively used dimensioning in iso views. we don't really do that type of piping, i perhaps could have put that in my original post but was just trying to get a feel for peoples standard practices and if we'd missed something in the standards someone here knew.
there are a few regular posters here who’s opinion i am beginning to value and wanted to see what they or anyone else had to say.
if this is the wrong place for a general question then please direct me to the right forum, i’m fairly new to eng-tips so apologies if i’ve broken a rule i was unaware of.
if there isn’t such a forum then maybe i’ll look at starting one if there would be any interest.
kenat,
this is the correct forum, and you have not broken any rules.
regards,
cory
this is as good a place to ask the question as any. i don't have access to a copy of the asme standards pertaining to drawing views, but per the genium drafting manual (which is based on these standards), isometric drawings are allowed, and are considered pictorial drawings, "which may be prepared to completely replace or avoid preparation of conventional drawings". hope that helps!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
acceptable to have assembly drawing an exploded view huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 04:34 PM
【转帖】named view extents yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 06:18 PM
【转帖】is dimensioningdetailing in isometric view acceptable yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:34 PM
【转帖】acceptable to have assembly drawing an exploded view yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:18 PM
【转帖】drawing view placements yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 10:35 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:22 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多