几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-05-04, 11:09 AM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】vertical feature control frame

vertical feature control frame
to the best of my knowledge, asme y14.5m-1994 does not explicitly say the gdt feature control frame must be horizontal, but i'm assuming it does. a coworker asked me if i thought a vertical box is allowed, and i'm not 100% certain the control frame has to be horizontal. any thoughts??
john graham cswp
mechanical design engineer
eng-tips forums is member supported.
asme y14.5m-1994 1.7.5 addresses this, more or less. notes & dimensions should be placed to read from the bottom of the draing. exception is baseline dims which may be read from right also.
so while it doesn't explicitly state fcf i would say that fcf are a form of dimensioning so should be read from the bottom.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
as kenat posts, all dimensional text (except baseline) is read from the bottom per y14.5. i would consider gd&t to be dimensional text.
just reading that doesn't really make sense to me. after all, vertical text (baseline dim.s) can be read from the bottom up. they clear that up with the examples shown. it would be easier to understand if they specified left-to-right, but maybe i'm missing something here.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

i think they're specifying the orientation of the drawing. so with the bottom of the drawing to the reader the text should be read normally.
make sense?
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
yeah, but i still like my way better.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

who doesn't
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
one of the reasons we use iso drawing standards, gtols can be horizontal or vertical. it makes a vastly better looking drawing.
"it makes a vastly better looking drawing."
i guess it really boils down to what you are used to seeing.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

dgallup, personally i'd say most iso drawings i've seen don't look as nice as most asme drawings i've seen, and i've worked both systems.
that said sometimes having to put everything horizontal can be a pain.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
geotols are hard enough to understand them when horizontal!
imho, the horizontal rule is more important nowadays than even back in the pre-cad era. reason is that all documents are natually viewed flat to the screen where the top of the document is the top of the screen. i disagree with using vertical text on documents these days because it requires the average person to tilt their head or find some way to rotate the document (which is different in each program, and even from version to version of a program...not to mention the fact that many programs think the rotational move is an edit that is meant to be saved).

matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
i am quite capable of reading vertical text without tilting my head.
to me, the most important concession to reading drawings on computer screens is to use compact sheet sizes. nicely spaced dimensions with vertical text on vertical dimensions can frequently allow the use of 1 size smaller drawing sheet compared to awkward irregularly spaced dimensions with horizontal text on vertical dimensions.
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】measurements on datum reference frame yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:48 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】composite two-single feature frame position tolerance yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:00 PM
【转帖】bidirectional tol. vs 2 single segment feature control frame yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:41 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:05 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多