几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 09:49 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】rules for rounding decimals

rules for rounding decimals
i have searched for rules of rounding and no luck. ansi z210.1 and ansi/ieee 268. anyone have an idea where i might find a standard pertaining to rounding, that will satisfy asme y14.5 or y14.41?
astm e 29 - 06 standard practice for using significant digits in test data to determine conformance with specifications
regards,
cory
let's make sure i understand the question, do you mean something in the asme standards that explcitly states that 1.50000000000000000... rounds up while 1.4999999999999... rounds down?
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
i was thinking in terms of rounding fractional equivalents, like .0625, .01625,.078125 to either 2 or 3 places.
and no, i do not propose using fractional equivalents on a new design unless driven by tool sizes or such.
the real problem occurs when the digit following the last place to be rounded to is 5. for example .625 rounded to 2 places. do we make it .62 or .63? at one time there was a rule which apparently is no longer existant.

in school, i learned an unwritten rule that says you should round a "5" to the even number unless there is some specific reason to round to the odd. i was never given a reason for this rule. i also do not believe it is explicitly stated in any standard.
there are standards regarding this kind of rounding in the statistics principle, but i do not know what the stadards are. though, i do not believe they are applicable to engineering drawings since (from what i understand of them) they make some assumptions that may contradict asme y14.5m's rule regarding the absolute nature of dimensional tolerancing.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
ringster, i think the same or very similar came up fairly recently, may have been a ringman post. take a look.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】number of decimals in a position fcf yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多