几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 08:45 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】manufacturing capabilities by feature type

manufacturing capabilities by feature type?
does anyone know of any resources anywhere showing the manufacturing capability* of (let's say) a sheet metal emboss, an injection-molded rib, etc.?
*in other words, how tight can tolerances be held for a particular type of feature in a diecast part, sheet metal parts, etc.
thanks in advance.
dan (on da bass!)
good one, and one i'd been planning on posting at some point.
i've looked on the internet and you can sometimes find information for certain processes but i've not found it all in one document.
i'd love something like the standard surface finish chart (
this is very highly dependent from shop to shop and machine to machine. for instance, i have 2 bridgeport mills in the tool room. i can often achieve tolerances of .0005 with one, whereas the other i'm lucky if i can hit .01. (both are manual).
also, it is going to depend on what you define as tight tolerances. a .0005 tol may be tight for an engine valve, but may be loose as can be for a heart valve.
you really need to consider tol on a case by case basis and a shop to shop basis; and it's highly dependent on your product's requirements.
imho there is too much generalization that is attempted regarding tolerancing.
wes c.
------------------------------
no trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
oh... and budget
wes c.
------------------------------
no trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
wes, you are correct.
ideally i design a part based on my experience/function and then the relevant process expert looks at it to suggest changes, including tolerance, that could reduce costs/ease manufacture etc.
back when i worked in a place that had its own machine shop and reasonable quantities of most parts i did this. in fact for high production parts it was part of the design review.
this is more difficult when you only use external machine shops and are pressed for time. for some parts it's still appropriate to take the time but but in my situation i have a lot of different mostly relatively simple parts but with low production rates.
so the initial guess is gonna be what you go with a lot of the time and it would be nice to get some information to support the guess.
sometimes the machine shops come back with suggestions, sometimes they just charge to meet your requirements.
we've also had machine shops take it too far, make multiple phone calls etc on how eliminating or changing a certain feature could save money only to find out the saving is only say $20 each on a total run of only 5, the amount of time spent on the phone & investigating the change etc probably cost more than this.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
iso 2768 kind of has this information.
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多