几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 06:59 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】collaborative design tools

collaborative design tools
i am a fire protection engineer working for an a/e firm.
our company is pushing (or being pushed)to move to revit for a lot of projects.
my question pertains to bim's (building information management). they seem to be similar to collaborative design tools in "part-making" industries.
how have or have these tools changed other industries at all? how have they done so? are they just a fad? i wonder about the benefit, but everyone seems to be pushing them.
thanks in advance.
an entire class of software that i might call "design automation tools" have appeared and evolved over the past two decades or so.
note that the salesmen hardly ever call on engineers. engineers don't have money to spend. salesmen call on managers, and sell the software as a way to reduce engineering labor costs.
in general, the stuff works... not at making anyone's job easier, and not at making the product better, but at reducing engineering labor costs.
detailers were the first to go. they all got jobs flipping burgers, and now are fast-food managers. reporting to them are the top-level designers, who are now shift leaders. flipping the actual burgers are the senior engineers.
what's left is junior level designers, now called engineers because they use a program that does "engineering". when they get a little experience, they're replaced with more neophytes, and either sweep floors at the burger place or go to work as project managers, trying to clean up the mess they made of the engineering work and wondering why the screwups never cease and why they can't get decent help and...
yes, the software has had some effect.
real engineering costs have gone up; apparent engineering costs have gone down. product quality has gone to hell, but apparent product quality is just fine, because nobody hires quality staff anymore. if you don't measure it, you can't know how bad it is, seems to be the operating philosophy.
... okay, _some_ of that is exaggerated, but not _all_ of it. it's a brave new world, now awaiting hope and change.
god help us all.

mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】are there any toolmakers in here advice required yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:26 PM
【转帖】updating the design library tab in the task pane yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 03:07 PM
【转帖】pattern in design table yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 01:19 PM
【转帖】modifying design table values with a macro yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-12 09:49 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:46 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多