几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:19 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wide flange beam - effect of fastener hole size in flange

wide flange beam - effect of fastener hole size in flange
i am designing a wide flange beam joined in the middle with flats on either side of the web and one on the top flange. how large can i (or should i) make the fastener for the top joint plate? there will be 1 hole each side of web and each side of joint. i am working with a w6 x 12lb beam, 1/2" bolts, but might consider 3/4" if the holes don't weaken the top tension loaded flange too much.
how do you propose to connect the tension flange together?
the top flange is probably in compression.
if you are asking about weakening of the flange due to the holes, reference section f13 of the aisc specification. but there is still of course a lot more design to address for this situation.
one fastener into the joint plate sounds light ... wouldn't two smaller ones be better than one large one ?
the simple (and perhaps misleading) answer is that you can make the holes as big as the required edge distance from section j3 and the required clearance to the web allow.
however, as haynewp correctly points out, the only way to make the connection work for sure is to look at all the failure modes and see what will work for your specific situation.
i suppose that if this were the only place this occured on the job and throwing an extra 30 bucks of steel at it makes the piece more than adequate by inspection, i might be inclined to do that. however, that method implies experience in connection design.
ok, better explanation of my problem. i have 2 beams, and i want to join the ends together. the resultant beam will be loaded at one end with 1000 lbs. and supported at 6' from the loaded end and at the other end, 16' from the load. the top beam flange will be in tension. i currently have a 1/2" x 4" x 10" flat plate, with 4 holes 9/16" dia. for 1/2" bolts. the flange bolts straddle the break line and web. on the web, i straddle the break line with 2 plates (one each side), 1/4" x 4" x 4", again with 4 holes for 1/2" bolts. at present, i have nothing on the bottom compression flange. i am wondering if i can use 3/4" bolts and not weaken the upper tension loaded flange which is 4" wide.
thanks
am i correct in saying that you are making a moment connection for a propped cantilever at a post with a backspan of 10 ft and a cantilever of 6 ft?
if this is correct, i would shy away from the bolted connection. why not weld the top plate to the top flanges? even if the bolts provide the required moment strength, the holes might allow more slip and subsequent deflection than you want. i would also connect the bottom flanges, even if by (2) plates (1 on each side of the web) on the top of the bottom flange.
is a full pen weld too expensive for this application?
don't forget that on a cantilever it is the top flange that bracing is more critical for, not the compression flange.
in any event, if the holes are not more than 15% of the flange area, you do not need to take a reduction for them.
loading can change, what if the load moves or additional load is placed between the supports? the compression flange switches to the top and the tension flange is not connected. agree with myerges, full penetration weld to connect is safest.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wide flange beam 9forces on web0 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:19 PM
eccentric load on a wide flange beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 08:15 PM
brain freeze on positional calculation huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:06 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】brain freeze on positional calculation yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:42 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多