几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 08:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 westergaard support reactions for wheel loads

westergaard support reactions for wheel loads
i have the paper by westergaard titled the computation of stresses in bridge slabs due to wheel loads from march 1930. in it table 10 indicates the left reactions for various spacings as a function of the simple span. can anyone verify the left reaction value for a 20 kip load placed 1 foot away from the left support for 7 foot wide concrete slab? the table indicates extremely small reaction values on the order of 0.0117 x 20 kips per foot or 234#/ft? any tips will be greatly appreciated.
without the paper, it's hard to say. sounds like it would be closer to 234#/inch.
as long as the units stay in feet it should come out in feet. the problem is the actual formula involves calculus with hyperbolic sine and cosine functions.takes for the tip.
cap4000:
i do not have the paper here at work but i will try to re
where did you find westergaard's paper? i looked for it everywhere.
me, too. i finally gave up.
i order it thru my local library. i believe they got it from the university of illinois library.
you can also order a copy of the paper for $16.00 from:
linda hall library
5109 cherry st.
kansas city, missouri 64110-2498
phone: 816-363-4600

i got a copy of westergaard's paper from the linda hall library. the 0.0117 factor from table 10 is the reaction per lineal foot at y/u=4. this corresponds to 234#/ft, as you say. but it's not the peak shear, it's the shear at 4*u or 4 feet away from the load. the shear adjacent to the load is 0.4535p, which corresponds to 9070#/ft. see the attached pdf, where i derived the coefficients in table 10, together with the corresponding shears, from formula 119.
miecz
i have already done a shell analysis on it with ram advanse. real nice job. done deal. thanks.
cap4000:
would you like to describe how you set up your model in advance and what kind of results you got compared to westigards method? i've not tried modeling a bridge deck as a shell in ram advanse.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
westergaard report wheel loads on elevated slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 08:08 PM
unfactored column loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 05:12 PM
ransient loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 03:35 PM
intl bldg code wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:19 PM
fea on conrete slab - use real loads or factored loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:24 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:53 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多