几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 02:55 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ire impact loading on pos

tire impact loading on post
i have been designing the barrier system for v8 a race in australia.
for the concrete barriers the calculations were pretty straight forward. we assumed that 4 - 3 barriers would act together through catenary action to resist the load. i assumed an inelastic collision between the car and the wall and determined system velocity. from there i used the weight of 4-3 walls and calculated the stopping distance of the wall due to the friction. i did the calculations for several situations and confirmed my results with the fia standards which uses the same logic.
the problem occurred when designing the debris fences.
to calculate the load of the tire on the mesh i calculated an equivalent spring constant of the mesh, treating it as simply supported between the posts. from there i calculated how far the fence would need to deflect to take out the kinetic energy of the tire in an inelastic collision - (this combines the fences weight and the tires and gives a systems velocity which is resisted by its elasticity) . it came to be about 8 kn which is close to the fia standards.
for the post i realized there is no way i can assume an inelastic collision and it would be much closer to perfectly elastic.
the question is how can i calculate my impulse loads on the posts?
using conventional mechanics will give a ridiculous force because the deflection of such a stiff post is so small.
say for a tire weighing 9 kg with a velocity of 27 m/s.
fence post will be chs 114.3 * 3 spaced at 4 m.
does anyone no of any standards or have experience in this area?
i have only been out of uni for 12 weeks so tread lightly lol.


well, why not assume that the post will bend plastically?
if a wheel and tire assembly hit the catch fence over my head i am not going to complain if the posts bend permanently.
cheers
greg locock
if you could give me any tips on how to anaylise it plastically it would be much appreciated.
i have sort of come to a mental road block.
ive been reading some complex impulse theory and the math is beyond my ability to follow and probally most engineers and is not practical out side of the lab.

bump.
i think most of us are reluctant to comment for fear that any advice we give will get you in trouble. designing race courses is a very high risk area, best left to specialists who have done it before. if you are in an office which has taken on this work without prior experience, tread carefully.
research the energy absorbed in a fully plastic hinge. it should involve the first moment of area and the yield stress.
have you contacted cams?
cheers
greg locock
bender, i don't have the credentials to formally help you, but i did touch sides with a problem that had some similarities some years back. it was in the form of a eurocode that required the structure of busses to have a minimum lateral strength. the test was that the structure had to deflect less than a set distance when the bus was allowed to roll & fall over certain height.
based on this work i did, i believe that you will have to approach the problem by allowing the posts to contribute to the point where a plastic hinge develops. there were some specialists in the field who ran sophisticated software that could "marry" the changing load diagram with the energy absorbed by plastic deformation. i don't have the name any more, so you'd have to trawl the 'net.
thanks.
i have been reading into plastic hinges in seems the way to go for this type of analysis.
but i think the direction were heading is the post will fail for all intesive purposes in the worst case scenario. we will have to design the debris fences to act as system which will give the required deflection to be on the safe side.

the book "design of welded structures" by blodgett has a section on absorbtion of impact loads by beams in bending. its a relatively inexpensive book published by the lincoln arc welding institute.
thanks everyone this information has been really useful.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
generation of impact factor of bridge standard loading huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:29 PM
designing for impact loading huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:14 PM
deisgn of steel hopper for impact loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:05 PM
asce 7 - impact loading for bulkheads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:55 PM
do-160 static loading vs impact loading huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-05 10:39 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:39 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多