几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 02:22 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ilt-up connections

tilt-up connections
i am working on a tilt-up warehouse in central california and i would like some feedback about a detail for supporting purlins at a panel joint. i have seen photos of similar details but i am not sure they are appropriate for my project. the proposed detail involves placing an embed with 4 nelson studs on each side of the joint beyween two panels and welding a heavy angle across to support the purlin. my concern is that it is a rigid connection at the edge of a panel, and thermal stresses, foundation settlement and seismic loads might cause the connection to crack or fail. the warehouse will be in a relatively low seismic region of california.

does anyone have experience with similar details and have you heard of any problems with a detail such as this? can you refer me to someone who might be familiar with this kind of design?

thank you for any help you can offer.
find a job or post a job opening
if this is at the level of the chord tie which is a rigid element, it may not be an issue.
however, it does point out the perennial problem of detail flexibility in these connections where a rigid tension tie is needed at the diaphragm level to resist the chord force. fyi, there is a connection to satisfy this problem, but it probably is not incorporated into your building if it is very old.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
i have seen the corners crack on tilt up panels because of the type connection you describe. the reasons this can happen are as you listed, with the addition of restrained drying shrinkage of the panels. if bolts or studs in adjacent panels are joined rigidly by a steel
thank you mr.mccann and hokie66 for the input.
this is a new structure, in plan check. we are planning to move the embeed plates further from the edge, but i have heard of other details such as slotted connection on one side. i am also interestd in more specific suggestions as well.
thanks for you consideration.
if the angle is discontinuous, a slotted connection on one side would work, as long as the discontinuity is on the same side as the slotted connection. as you indicated the angle is to support purlins, you should be able to break the angle at the correct positions. but an embedded plate with nelson studs on each side of the purlin does seem very heavy for just a purlin support. perhaps you can elaborate on your roof bracing scheme.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:09 AM
single plate connections to tube steel columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 10:57 PM
designation of bolted connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:07 PM
design of moment connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:43 PM
connections for torsion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:18 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:04 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多