几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 01:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 he wind coefficients on a mwfrs of a multi-gabled roof

the wind coefficients on a mwfrs of a multi-gabled roof
i have a problem in determining the wind coefficients on a mwfrs of a multi-gabled roof for a warehouse. one of my friends advised me to use the coefficients addressed in asce for low rise buildings, but i am not convinced. the ware house is the biggest in the world as my team leader tolled me (180x850m) and divided into several parts, each one is (180x180m). asce addresses only multi-gabled roof for c&c but not for a mwfrs (i don't know the reason). please, is there anyone can help or give his advise.
thanks,
m.nour

what is the height of gable roof? if you have asce 7-05, check page 48. it gives mwfrs for gable roof.
thanks dgkhan. the height of the warehouse is 10.75 m, also the asce-05 page 48 addressing only gabled roof not multi span-gabled roof like the case of c&c in page 60.
nour75
height is less than 60 feet so page 60 and 58 is applicable. p-48 is for all heights. compare the results for gcp for page 58 ~ 60. multi-span coefficients are twice than single span. so you can use page 48 and double the gcp.
if you cannot sleep on it than use page 50 gcp. it's overkill but ...
hope you got your answers, otherwise i am waiting
thanks again dgkhan. page 60 and 58 is applicable for components and cladding (c & c) only not for main wind force resisting system. p-48 is for all heights of main wind force resisting systems, but not for multi span-gabled roof. i want a provision or a figure that addressing the case of the multi span-gabled roof for a main wind force resisting system.
nour75
you will not get what you are looking for. that's why we as engineers are hired to use our engineering judgement.
if you re read my last answer, i gave you the options you have. now if you want to go beyond that than either go for method three and have wind tunnel test or write mr. kishore c. mehta, the authority on wind loads and main writer for asce wind portion.
nour75,
i don't know the answer to your question, but might sugest you also try other groups as well. seaint.org or other sea organizations, not to mention google. also, the method three suggestion may save money in the long run.
i've posted a reply in building information modelling...
dik
dik,
what is the thread number or link so that i can read.
thanks.
thread 1402-209025
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
emporary wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 01:09 PM
snow drift flat roof adjacent to gable huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:55 PM
perpendicular roof wind pressures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:13 PM
mwfrs or c=c huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:30 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多